e-learning
resources
Munich 2006
Monday 04.09.2006
Pulmonary embolism
Login
Search all ERS
e-learning
resources
Disease Areas
Airways Diseases
Interstitial Lung Diseases
Respiratory Critical Care
Respiratory Infections
Paediatric Respiratory Diseases
Pulmonary Vascular Diseases
Sleep and Breathing Disorders
Thoracic Oncology
Events
International Congress
Courses
Webinars
Conferences
Research Seminars
Journal Clubs
Publications
Breathe
Monograph
ERJ
ERJ Open Research
ERR
European Lung White Book
Handbook Series
Guidelines
All ERS guidelines
e-learning
CME Online
Case reports
Short Videos
SpirXpert
Procedure Videos
CME tests
Reference Database of Respiratory Sounds
Radiology Image Challenge
Brief tobacco interventions
EU Projects
VALUE-Dx
ERN-LUNG
ECRAID
UNITE4TB
Disease Areas
Events
Publications
Guidelines
e-learning
EU Projects
Login
Search
Comparison of three clinical scoring methods in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism
R. Unver, G. Okumus, E. Kiyan, L. Tabak, H. Issever, O. Arseven (Istanbul, Turkey)
Source:
Annual Congress 2006 - Pulmonary embolism
Session:
Pulmonary embolism
Session type:
Oral Presentation
Number:
2184
Disease area:
Pulmonary vascular diseases, Respiratory infections
Rating:
You must
login
to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
R. Unver, G. Okumus, E. Kiyan, L. Tabak, H. Issever, O. Arseven (Istanbul, Turkey). Comparison of three clinical scoring methods in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism. Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 2184
You must
login
to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
No comment yet.
You must
Login
to comment this presentation.
Related content which might interest you:
Expert interview: TB-Machine learning and artificial intelligence as allies in clinical decision
Debate -Tuberculosis: Rolling out of new drugs without diagnostic capacities
Panel discussion on unprecedented progress in shortening treatment for TB: Evidence to date, and future possibilities
Related content which might interest you:
Comparison of three clinical probability methods among patients with suspected pulmonary thromboembolism
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Pulmonary venous thromboembolic disease
Year: 2008
Comparison of three clinical prediction rules among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 685s
Year: 2004
Evaluation of different scoring methods in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Pulmonary venous thromboembolic disease and other pulmonary vascular disorders
Year: 2010
Frequency of venous thromboembolism among patients with tuberculosis
Source: Annual Congress 2005 - Management of tuberculosis pulmonary, extrapulmonary peculiarities
Year: 2005
Adequate use of pulmonary embolism clinical prediction rule in COPD patients
Source: Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 219-220
Year: 2011
Comparison of the clinical probability scores and diagnostic tests of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Pulmonary venous thromboembolic disease
Year: 2008
Comparison of risk assessment strategies for not-high-risk pulmonary embolism
Source: Eur Respir J 2016; 47: 1170-1178
Year: 2016
Evaluation of various procedures in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 521s
Year: 2005
Comparision of the severity of the disease and 4 different clinical scoring systems in pulmonary embolism
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Pulmonary embolism and cardiovascular diseases
Year: 2009
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with clinically unsuspected pulmonary embolism versus patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Pulmonary circulation: acute and chronic pulmonary embolism
Year: 2012
Prognostic value of the ECG on admission in patients with acute major pulmonary embolism
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 25: 843-848
Year: 2005
The shock index and the simplified PESI for identification of low-risk patients with acute pulmonary embolism
Source: Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 762-766
Year: 2011
Pulmonary embolism severity index is useful in predicting mortality in patients investigated for query pulmonary embolism and negative CTPA
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Pulmonary venous thromboembolic disease
Year: 2008
Frequency of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension screening after pulmonary embolism in cancer patients.
Source: International Congress 2018 – Pulmonary embolism: long-term sequelae and advances in therapies
Year: 2018
Evaluation of the medical knowledge degree about clinical suspicion of pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE)
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 46s
Year: 2006
Clinical usefulness of D-dimer according to clinical probability in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 220s
Year: 2003
The comparison of three different clinical probability methods and the ECG score in patients with suspected venous thromboembolism
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Venous thromboembolic disease
Year: 2007
Clinical manifestations and prediction rules in patients with pulmonary embolism and prior respiratory disease
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Prediction of pulmonary thromboembolism
Year: 2011
Pulmonary embolism severity index and D-dimer for risk-stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Pulmonary venous thromboembolic disease and other pulmonary vascular disorders
Year: 2010
Original, simplified, and modified pulmonary embolism severity indices in risk stratification of pulmonary embolism
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Pulmonary embolism and beyond
Year: 2020
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of the cookies.
Accept