Does feedback improve compliance to the ATS/ERS 2005 acceptability criteria in our lung function laboratory? Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Quality spirometry: the only spirometry! Year: 2008
Adherence to acceptability and reproducibility criteria for spirometry in complex lung function laboratories Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 280s Year: 2006
Deep-learning algorithm helps to standardise ATS/ERS spirometric acceptability and usability criteria Source: Eur Respir J, 56 (6) 2000603; 10.1183/13993003.00603-2020 Year: 2020
Impact of incorporating the evaluation of full inflation recommended in the 2019 spirometry standards on the evaluation of spirometry acceptability Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – New insights into lung function testing Year: 2021
Adeherence to spirometry reproducibility guidelines – a re-audit Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Quality spirometry: the only spirometry! Year: 2008
Assessment of asthma control based on French guidelines criteria. Results from a pharmacy-based study Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 684s Year: 2006
Appropriate interpretation of longitudinal spirometry assessments Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Reference, reliability and risk: advances in lung function Year: 2013
Factors influencing compliance to PEF monitoring in asthma Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Asthma treatment and management in children Year: 2013
Quality of spirometric tests in Dutch general practices Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 614s Year: 2006
Impact on spirometry quality results when using 2005 or 2019 ATS/ERS guidelines Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Future advances in respiratory physiology Year: 2021
Improvement patient safety during lung function testing through the implementation of a safety checklist Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Lung function diagnostics Year: 2020
Can high quality spirometry according to ERS criteria be obtained regardless of age? Source: International Congress 2014 – The impact of the Global Lung Initiative (GLI) reference equations and spirometry quality in all ages Year: 2014
Lack of agreement between GINA guidelines and physician assessment of asthma severity Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 591s Year: 2004
Automated chart review for assessing adherence to asthma guidelines for asthma triggers Source: International Congress 2018 – Asthma: clinical screening tools Year: 2018
An assessment of physicians knowledge of the GINA guidelines Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Medical education Year: 2011
Is documentation of admissions for asthma adequate to assess adherence to BTS/SIGN guidelines? Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 46s Year: 2005
Study of the adherence to treatment in asthma according to clinical, psychological and educational parameters Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 44s Year: 2001
Global asthma physician & patient (GAPP) survey: differences between treatment practice and GINA guideline recommendations in Europe – adult findings Source: Annual Congress 2006 - New developments in the management of asthma Year: 2006
Efficacy and safety of applying the British Thoracic Society (BTS) criteria to determine appropriateness of follow up in general respiratory clinics Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Looking at the cost effectiveness of asthma and COPD treatment by novel drugs and improved management Year: 2012
Clinical exercise testing with reference to lung diseases: indications, standardization and interpretation strategies Source: Guideline 1997 Year: 1997