Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA detection in urine samples from pulmonary tuberculosis patients

A. Cannas, L. Calvo, T. Chiacchio, G. Cuzzi, R. Urso, F. Noto, S. Grisetti, M. Di Marco, A. Gualano, D. Goletti, E. Girardi (Rome, Italy)

Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Genetics, immunology and microbiology of tuberculosis
Session: Genetics, immunology and microbiology of tuberculosis
Session type: E-Communication Session
Number: 4527
Disease area: Respiratory infections

Congress or journal article abstractE-poster

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
A. Cannas, L. Calvo, T. Chiacchio, G. Cuzzi, R. Urso, F. Noto, S. Grisetti, M. Di Marco, A. Gualano, D. Goletti, E. Girardi (Rome, Italy). Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA detection in urine samples from pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Eur Respir J 2008; 32: Suppl. 52, 4527

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

Angela Cannas - 08.10.2008 08:19
Treatment monitoring and renal TB exclusion
We have data on TB Tr-DNA analysis at 2 months after start of treatment, where the signal is not present anymore. We are organizing at the moment a study of evaluation of Tr-DNA assay for therapy monitoring. The exclusion of renal involvement in these patients is based on clinical and microbiological diagnosis (urine culture).

Paul Kelly - 07.10.2008 10:18
P Kelly
Very interesting experiment. Do the DNA fragments disappear during treatment ? In patients in whom mycobacterial DNA was detected in urine how certain are you that they do not have GU tract/renal TB ? Are all these DNA fragments small enough to pass in glomular filtration ?

Angela Cannas - 06.10.2008 15:25
Details on Tr-DNA study
Thanks for the comments. Here the answers: 1. The non invasiveness would definitely be the biggest advantage of a test run on urine specimens, especially in situations characterized by difficulties in obtaining a sputum sample, as in children. 2. Sensitivity of the test, at the moment, is low, if compared with tests that use sputum specimens. We look for a very small amount of DNA , supposing that this DNA comes to the urine from a distant site (ex. lungs). The hypothesis is that bacterial DNA undergoes fragmentation and a portion of these fragments is transported through blood and renal barrier. 3. I agree with your suggestion to compare to other molecular assays, and we'll plan further studies including this aspect. 4. We are moving forward our studies, in two directions: a) to study a larger number of TB patients, based on enrollment of high suspect of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary TB patients. This will lead to increase the number of AFB and culture neg TB. B) to improve the test technically: we are at the moment developing a Real-Time amplification-based test, being aware of limitations of a semi-nested PCR assay.

Massimo Amicosante - 04.10.2008 10:37
Diagnostic Consideration
The only advantage that I see in the study reported that the sample to identify MTB specific DNA is coming from a non invasive procedure. The sensitivity reported for the Tr-DNA (34/43, 79%) is significantly lower than the sensitivity of the amplification performed (35/37, 96%) on other speciments (I suppose sputum or other pulmonary samples if I have well understood table 1), p=0.039. Further, the study was performed in a group of TB patient that were almost all AFB-positive (41/43) where usually the molecular tests on pulmonary derived speciments are performing very well (as also demonstrate by the data on the Table 1) and the potential clinically usage of the Tr-DNA assay seems to be suboptimal even using a detection system potentially very sensitive (as well as critical for being used in standard clinical laboratory conditions) like a semi-nested PCR. I would suggest to comments these points, to present the data in comparisons with the other molecular assay performed and to enlarge the study to AFB-negative subjects.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Results of drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from sputum and surgical material from pulmonary tuberculosis patients
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis
Year: 2020


FluoroType MTB system for the detection of pulmonary tuberculosis
Source: ERJ Open Res, 3 (2) 00113-2016; 10.1183/23120541.00113-2016
Year: 2017



Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA from peripheral blood in patients with HIV-seronegative and new cases of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 168s
Year: 2002

Express detection and differentiation of M. tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria in samples
Source: International Congress 2017 – MDRTB: detection and management
Year: 2017

Comparative analysis of detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampin resistance determination through microbiological and molecular genetics methods for pulmonary tuberculosis patients with presence or absence of sputum
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Microbiological advances in the diagnosis of tuberculosis
Year: 2012


DNA fingerprint analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains isolated from homeless tuberculosis patients in Budapest
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 424s
Year: 2004

Study of genetic heterogeneity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from tuberculosis patients using DNA fingerprinting
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 655s
Year: 2005

From detection of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in pulmonary specimens to pulmonary infections
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 420s
Year: 2004

Mycobacterial non-tuberculosis infection in patients operated on for pulmonary tuberculosis
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Thoracic surgery: lung cancer and infectious disease
Year: 2020


Role of 2-month sputum smears in predicting culture conversion in pulmonary tuberculosis
Source: Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 376
Year: 2011



The utility of a serodiagnosis for mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease diagnosed by the single available bronchial wash
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 206s
Year: 2004

Pulmonary tuberculosis among elderly and senile-aged patients depending on Mycobacterium strains
Source: International Congress 2017 – TB: co-morbidities and outcome
Year: 2017


Sentinel-site surveillance of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 1092-1096
Year: 2005



Response to M. tuberculosis selected RD1 peptides in Ugandan HIV-infected patients with smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Interferon-gamma release assay tests for diagnosing tuberculosis infection and disease
Year: 2008


Diagnostic value of PCR-RT for the detection of DNA Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MBT) in blood from patient with pulmonary tuberculosis (PT)
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Diagnostic advances in tuberculosis
Year: 2009

Detection of isoniazid or rifampin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in patients with cavity and previously treated for tuberculosis - usefulness of rapid drug susceptibility test with sputum samples by reverse hybridization assay
Source: Annual Congress 2005 - Resistant and multidrug resistant tuberculosis
Year: 2005


Clinical and laboratory features of Mycobacterium avium complex infection in comparison with infection, caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, in HIV-infected patients
Source: International Congress 2019 – Tuberculosis and non-TB mycobacterial infection II
Year: 2019


Comparison of two commercial interferon-γ assays for diagnosing Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: 24-30
Year: 2006



Risk factors for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection among contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis patients
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections: epidemiology I
Year: 2012