Impact of the NRF2 activator, stabilised synthetic sulforaphane, on systemic inflammation in COVID19: results from the STAR-COVID19 trial

M. Long (Dundee, United Kingdom), Y. Giam (Dundee, United Kingdom), H. Abo-Leyah (Dundee, United Kingdom), R. Hull (Sheffield, United Kingdom), H. Keir (Dundee, United Kingdom), T. Pembridge (Dundee, United Kingdom), D. Alferes De Lima (Dundee, United Kingdom), B. New (Dundee, United Kingdom), S. Inglis (Dundee, United Kingdom), T. Vadiveloo (Aberdeen, United Kingdom), G. Maclennan (Aberdeen, United Kingdom), A. Gilmour (Dundee, United Kingdom), C. Hughes (Dundee, United Kingdom), L. Delgado (Dundee, United Kingdom), A. Dinkova-Kostova (Dundee, United Kingdom), J. Chalmers (Dundee, United Kingdom)

Source: International Congress 2022 – COVID basic science
Session: COVID basic science
Session type: Thematic Poster
Number: 4066

Congress or journal article abstractE-poster

Abstract

Introduction: Dysregulated immune responses are implicated in the pathogenesis of severe COVID19 and may be modulated by the transcription factor Nrf2.

Hypothesis: Treatment with stabilised, synthetic sulforaphane (S-SFN)—an Nrf2 inducer—improves clinical status in hospitalised patients with suspected COVID19 pneumonia by curbing the inflammatory response.

Methods: Double-blind RCT of S-SFN (300mg, once daily, 14 days; EudraCT 2020-003486-19) in patients hospitalised with confirmed or suspected COVID19, in Dundee, UK. The primary outcome was the 7 point WHO Clinical Status scale at day 15. Blood samples were taken on days 1, 8 and 15 for measurement of 45 serum cytokines using the Olink Target48 panel. Key neutrophil functions were assessed including migration, phagocytosis and bacterial killing.

Results: 133 participants were randomized (placebo n=68, S-SFN n=65) from Nov 2020 to May 2021. S-SFN treatment did not improve clinical status at day 15 (adjusted OR 0.87 95%CI 0.41-1.83).

In serum, Nrf2 target TGFa was significantly increased at day 15 in those receiving S-SFN treatment compared with placebo (p=0.004; linear mixed effects model). Other targets implicated in cytokine storm, including IL6, IL1ß and TNFa, were unchanged. Patients receiving Tocilizumab (n=20) were excluded from exploratory analyses due to a strong impact upon IL6 levels, leading to significant increases at day 8 across the study population (p=0.015). S-SFN treatment did not significantly affect neutrophil function.

Conclusion: S-SFN treatment modulated select Nrf2 targets but did not modulate key cytokines. Further analyses to delineate drug activity are ongoing.



Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
M. Long (Dundee, United Kingdom), Y. Giam (Dundee, United Kingdom), H. Abo-Leyah (Dundee, United Kingdom), R. Hull (Sheffield, United Kingdom), H. Keir (Dundee, United Kingdom), T. Pembridge (Dundee, United Kingdom), D. Alferes De Lima (Dundee, United Kingdom), B. New (Dundee, United Kingdom), S. Inglis (Dundee, United Kingdom), T. Vadiveloo (Aberdeen, United Kingdom), G. Maclennan (Aberdeen, United Kingdom), A. Gilmour (Dundee, United Kingdom), C. Hughes (Dundee, United Kingdom), L. Delgado (Dundee, United Kingdom), A. Dinkova-Kostova (Dundee, United Kingdom), J. Chalmers (Dundee, United Kingdom). Impact of the NRF2 activator, stabilised synthetic sulforaphane, on systemic inflammation in COVID19: results from the STAR-COVID19 trial. 4066

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.