Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – New insights into lung function testing



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
K. McCarthy (Matthews, United States of America), R. Farienfar (Wuerzburg, Germany), P. Lake (Monmouth, United Kingdom), D. Patterson (Philadelphia, United States of America), M. Raffensperger (Bozeman, United States of America). Impact of incorporating the evaluation of full inflation recommended in the 2019 spirometry standards on the evaluation of spirometry acceptability. 3218

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Adeherence to spirometry reproducibility guidelines – a re-audit Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Quality spirometry: the only spirometry! Year: 2008 Impact of two spirometry training programs on test quality in Dutch general practices Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Quality of diagnosis and assessment in primary care Year: 2013 Development and pilot evaluation of a quality grading system for paediatric spirometry Source: International Congress 2018 – Quality, reference values and standards Year: 2018 Assessment of the effect of community spirometry testing on diagnosis and management Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 62s Year: 2005 Adherence to acceptability and reproducibility criteria for spirometry in complex lung function laboratories Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 280s Year: 2006 Improving quality in spirometry Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Quality measurement and improvement in lung function Year: 2010 Improving spirometry in pharmaceutical CTs Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Quality spirometry: the only spirometry! Year: 2008 Reliability of forced spirometry in primary care: assessment of the impact of a remote assistance program Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 181s Year: 2004 Appropriate interpretation of longitudinal spirometry assessments Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Reference, reliability and risk: advances in lung function Year: 2013 Impact on spirometry quality results when using 2005 or 2019 ATS/ERS guidelines Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Future advances in respiratory physiology Year: 2021 ERS Spirometry Driving Licence: spirometry training and the benefits of quality measurements Source: International Congress 2016 – Implementation of collaborative lung function testing Year: 2016 Quality control of pneumotach's for routine spirometry. Results from a national audit Source: International Congress 2014 – Respiratory function: quality and new technologies Year: 2014 Laboratory compliance with published acceptability criteria for spirometry and influencing factors Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 280s Year: 2006 Feasibility and acceptability of spirometry and FeNO testing in children treated for asthma in primary care Source: International Congress 2017 – Diagnostic tools in paediatric asthma Year: 2017 Benefits of a modified spirometry technique Source: Eur Respir J 2007; 30: 813-814 Year: 2007 Deep-learning algorithm helps to standardise ATS/ERS spirometric acceptability and usability criteria Source: Eur Respir J, 56 (6) 2000603; 10.1183/13993003.00603-2020 Year: 2020 Achieving quality spirometry in the office Source: Breathe 2010; 6: 211-219 Year: 2010 Quality of spirometric tests in Dutch general practices Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 614s Year: 2006 Spirometry training courses are not enough to achieve quality spirometry in the community Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Going with the flow: assessment and evaluation of airway function and its role in patient management Year: 2012 Setting up community-based spirometry testing Source: Annual Congress 2007 - PG17 - Lung function measurement in the community Year: 2007