Effect of changing post gas-sampling point equipment dead space on MBW outcomes
R. Jensen (Toronto (ON), Canada), M. Shaw (Toronto (ON), Canada), S. Stanojevic (Toronto (ON), Canada), J. Guido (Toronto (ON), Canada), C. Clem (Indianapolis, United States of America), S. Jara (Indianapolis, United States of America), S. Davis (Chapel Hill, United States of America), H. Grasemann (Toronto (ON), Canada), M. Solomon (Toronto (ON), Canada), N. Sweezey (Toronto (ON), Canada), V. Waters (Toronto (ON), Canada), F. Ratjen (Toronto (ON), Canada)
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Advances in lung function testing
Session: Advances in lung function testing
Session type: E-poster session
Number: 3078
Disease area: Paediatric lung diseases
Rating:
You must login to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
R. Jensen (Toronto (ON), Canada), M. Shaw (Toronto (ON), Canada), S. Stanojevic (Toronto (ON), Canada), J. Guido (Toronto (ON), Canada), C. Clem (Indianapolis, United States of America), S. Jara (Indianapolis, United States of America), S. Davis (Chapel Hill, United States of America), H. Grasemann (Toronto (ON), Canada), M. Solomon (Toronto (ON), Canada), N. Sweezey (Toronto (ON), Canada), V. Waters (Toronto (ON), Canada), F. Ratjen (Toronto (ON), Canada). Effect of changing post gas-sampling point equipment dead space on MBW outcomes. 3078
You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
Related content which might interest you:
Related content which might interest you: