Methacholine challenges: comparison of different tidal breathing challenge methods.
J. Dean (Manchester, United Kingdom), L. Connor (Manchester, United Kingdom), N. Jackson (Manchester, United Kingdom), B. Keidel-Morgan (Manchester, United Kingdom), D. Hamer (Manchester, United Kingdom), D. Singh (Manchester, United Kingdom)
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Advances in lung function testing
Session: Advances in lung function testing
Session type: E-poster session
Number: 3075
Disease area: Airway diseases
Rating:
You must login to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
J. Dean (Manchester, United Kingdom), L. Connor (Manchester, United Kingdom), N. Jackson (Manchester, United Kingdom), B. Keidel-Morgan (Manchester, United Kingdom), D. Hamer (Manchester, United Kingdom), D. Singh (Manchester, United Kingdom). Methacholine challenges: comparison of different tidal breathing challenge methods.. 3075
You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
Related content which might interest you:
Related content which might interest you:
ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests Source: Guideline 2017 Year: 2017
ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests Source: Eur Respir J, 49 (5) 1601526; 10.1183/13993003.01526-2016 Year: 2017
Comparison of variations of FEV1 and forced oscillation technique during methacholine challenge Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 339s Year: 2004
Respiratory impedance response to a deep inhalation (DI) in children during methacholine (MCh) challenge Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 347s Year: 2001
30 Seconds tidal breathing method with AeroEclipse II nebulizer (AE) versus aerosol provocation system (APS) in methacholine challenge testing Source: International Congress 2014 – Airways: reversibility and responsiveness Year: 2014
Assessing response to methacholine challenges using a new forced oscillation device Source: International Congress 2016 – Pathophysiological mechanisms at different levels: lung, airways, muscles and symptom perception Year: 2016
Methacholine challenge test with impulse oscillometry versus spirometry: which is more sensitive in detecting airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR?) Source: International Congress 2018 – Clinical and functional monitoring in airway disease Year: 2018
Methacholine challenge in preschool children: comparison of transcutaneous measurement of oxygen (PtcO2), resistance by interrupter technique (Rint) and specific airway resistance (sRaw) Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 707s Year: 2006
Methacholine inhalation challenge: a shorter, cheaper and safe approach Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 17: 46-51 Year: 2001
Can airway resistance, measured by the interrupter technique, be useful in evaluating the methacholine bronchial challenge test in children? Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 585s Year: 2004
Use of within-breath Rrs values at 5 Hz to estimate resistive work of breathing during histamine challenge tests Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 12s Year: 2002
A comparison of spirometry and airways resistance during histamine challenge testing Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Airway hyperresponsiveness: mechanism and assessment Year: 2009
Assessment of airway responsiveness: Comparison of forced spirometry and body plethysmography for methacholine challenge tests Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Advances in lung function II Year: 2010
Assessment of expiratory flow limitation in metacholine challenge in pigs Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 339s Year: 2004
What more can we learn from body-box measurements compared with spirometry? Source: Annual Congress 2005 - MP1 - What more can we learn from body-box measurements compared with spirometry? Year: 2005
ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: pathophysiology and methodology of indirect airway challenge testing Source: Eur Respir J, 52 (5) 1801033; 10.1183/13993003.01033-2018 Year: 2018
ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: pathophysiology and methodology of indirect airway challenge testing Source: Eur Respir J 2018; 52: 1801033 Year: 2018
Metacholine challenge test - the ²Yan-method² applying an ²artificial hand² Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 267s Year: 2004
Reliability, consistency and variability of base-line spirometric and plethysmographic measurements prior to methacholine challenge tests assess airway hyperreactivity (AHR) Source: International Congress 2016 – The future of lung function is beginning now Year: 2016
Methacholine challenges for detection of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) – a comparison of forced spirometry and body plethysmography Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Airway hyperresponsiveness: mechanism and assessment Year: 2009