e-learning
resources
Virtual 2020
Pre-Congress Content
Clinical aspects of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Login
Search all ERS
e-learning
resources
Disease Areas
Airways Diseases
Interstitial Lung Diseases
Respiratory Critical Care
Respiratory Infections
Paediatric Respiratory Diseases
Pulmonary Vascular Diseases
Sleep and Breathing Disorders
Thoracic Oncology
Events
International Congress
Courses
Webinars
Conferences
Research Seminars
Journal Clubs
Publications
Breathe
Monograph
ERJ
ERJ Open Research
ERR
European Lung White Book
Handbook Series
Guidelines
All ERS guidelines
e-learning
CME Online
Case reports
Short Videos
SpirXpert
Procedure Videos
CME tests
Reference Database of Respiratory Sounds
Radiology Image Challenge
Brief tobacco interventions
EU Projects
VALUE-Dx
ERN-LUNG
ECRAID
UNITE4TB
Disease Areas
Events
Publications
Guidelines
e-learning
EU Projects
Login
Search
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of K-BILD and SGRQ-I
T. Prior (Aarhus, Denmark), N. Hoyer (Copenhagen, Denmark), O. Hilberg (Vejle, Denmark), S. Shaker (Copenhagen, Denmark), J. Davidsen (Odense, Denmark), E. Bendstrup (Aarhus, Denmark)
Source:
Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical aspects of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Session:
Clinical aspects of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Session type:
E-poster session
Number:
771
Disease area:
Interstitial lung diseases
Rating:
You must
login
to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
T. Prior (Aarhus, Denmark), N. Hoyer (Copenhagen, Denmark), O. Hilberg (Vejle, Denmark), S. Shaker (Copenhagen, Denmark), J. Davidsen (Odense, Denmark), E. Bendstrup (Aarhus, Denmark). Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of K-BILD and SGRQ-I. 771
You must
login
to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
No comment yet.
You must
Login
to comment this presentation.
Related content which might interest you:
Panel discussion: Diagnostic tools for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea in adults and children
Expert interview: Physiological classification of lung function impairment
Occupational exposures to respiratory diseases: A case-based discussion
Related content which might interest you:
The Severe Asthma Questionnaire: sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference
Source: Eur Respir J, 57 (6) 2100300; 10.1183/13993003.00300-2021
Year: 2021
The Severe Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ) - minimal clinically important difference and sensitivity to change
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): easy tools in the management of chronic respiratory diseases
Year: 2021
Minimal clinically important difference of the Brief-BESTest in COPD
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation: part 1
Year: 2020
Minimal clinically important difference of the clinical COPD questionnaire
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 689s
Year: 2004
Minimal clinically important difference and predictive validity of the mMRC and mBorg in acute exacerbations of COPD
Source: International Congress 2017 – Assessing functional outcomes in chronic respiratory disease
Year: 2017
Minimal important difference for the asthma control questionnaire
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 460s
Year: 2004
Minimum clinically important difference of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Source: International Congress 2017 – Risk factors: symptomatology and diagnostic approaches for obstructive sleep apnoea
Year: 2017
Quality of life in severe asthma measured by SAQ and EQ5D questionnaires as a function of clinically relevant cut off points
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical parameters in severe asthma
Year: 2020
The minimal clinically important difference of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire.
Source: International Congress 2018 – Non-invasive ventilation in chronic respiratory failure
Year: 2018
Assessment of cognitive functions in stable COPD patients using PGI Memory Scale and to analyze for their correlation with patients‘ characteristics and BODE index
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Quality of life and clinical parametres in monitoring airway diseases
Year: 2012
The SAQ is a valid quality of life measure in severe asthma: the mini-AQLQ and ACQ both measure symptoms
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Phenotypes of obstructive diseases
Year: 2020
Bronchiectasis Severity Index and FACED score correlation determinants
Source: International Congress 2019 – Phenotypes and endotypes of bronchiectasis
Year: 2019
King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire: responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference
Source: Eur Respir J, 54 (3) 1900281; 10.1183/13993003.00281-2019
Year: 2019
Fatigue changes in IPF patients measured by the Fatigue Assessment Scale during antifibrotic treatment
Source: International Congress 2019 – Innovations in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Year: 2019
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in Bronchiectasis: Response to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID)
Source: International Congress 2019 – Hot topics in pulmonary rehabilitation
Year: 2019
Are ACQ scores a useful measure of severity in obese patients?
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Disease control and quality of life in airway diseases
Year: 2013
Estimation of minimum clinically important difference in EQ-VAS score after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients
Source: International Congress 2014 – Best posters in chronic care
Year: 2014
Assessing sarcoidosis: The King‘s Sarcoidosis Questionnaire and the minimal important difference
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Cystic lung diseases: lung granulomatosis
Year: 2012
The EQ5D5L in COPD: Validity, responsiveness and minimum important difference (MID)
Source: International Congress 2015 – Latest insights into pulmonary rehabilitation
Year: 2015
Is the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) fit for purpose? A planned study using the SAQ
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical parameters in severe asthma
Year: 2020
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of the cookies.
Accept