Source: International Congress 2017 – Best abstracts in lung function
Disease area: Airway diseases



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
M. Chushkin (Moscow, Russian Federation). Comparison between results of spirometry performed with the ATS/ERS quantitative criteria and simple visual inspection criteria. 3440

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Quality control of spirometry in children: Can ERS/ATS criteria replace visual inspection? Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Advances in lung function testing from infancy to adulthood Year: 2011 Deep-learning algorithm helps to standardise ATS/ERS spirometric acceptability and usability criteria Source: Eur Respir J, 56 (6) 2000603; 10.1183/13993003.00603-2020 Year: 2020 ERS/ATS technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests Source: Guideline 2021 Year: 2021 Number of tests and the time needed to fulfil the quality criteria for plethysmographic measurements Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Quality control in lung function and exercise-related issues Year: 2011 Adherence to acceptability and reproducibility criteria for spirometry in complex lung function laboratories Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 280s Year: 2006 Comparison of observer variability and accuracy of different criteria for lung scan interpretation Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 226s Year: 2001 Adeherence to spirometry reproducibility guidelines – a re-audit Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Quality spirometry: the only spirometry! Year: 2008 Clinical interpretation of spirometry results Source: Paris 2018 - Educational material Year: 2018 Does feedback improve compliance to the ATS/ERS 2005 acceptability criteria in our lung function laboratory? Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Quality spirometry: the only spirometry! Year: 2008 Classification of spirometric tests results using neural network Source: Annual Congress 2005 - Spirometry - now and in the future Year: 2005 Standardization of parameters, theoreticians, interpretation and reports in spirometry Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 178s Year: 2005 Workstation 4 – Evaluation of spirometric results: review spirometry results by using case studies Source: International Congress 2014 – EW7 Spirometry knowledge and basic skills (European spirometry training programme) Year: 2014 Workstation 4 – Evaluation of spirometric results: review spirometry results by using case studies Source: International Congress 2014 – EW9 Spirometry knowledge and basic skills (European spirometry training programme) Year: 2014 Workstation 4 – Evaluation of spirometric results: review spirometry results by using case studies Source: International Congress 2014 – EW8 Spirometry knowledge and basic skills (European spirometry training programme) Year: 2014 Validation of assisted automated scoring versus manual scoring of polysmnography (PSG) studies Source: International Congress 2017 – Diagnostic approaches to obstructive sleep apnoea Year: 2017 Quantitative start of test criteria for spirometry in preschool children Source: International Congress 2019 – New developments in sleep-disordered breathing, gas exchange and lung function in children Year: 2019 Improvement of quality of spirometric measurements after analysis of errors detected by spirometric software Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Expiration, exhalation and exhaustion: measures of dynamic volumes, breath analysis and respiratory muscles Year: 2013 Spirometry training does not guarantee valid results Source: Annual Congress 2005 - Spirometry - now and in the future Year: 2005 Can high quality spirometry according to ERS criteria be obtained regardless of age? Source: International Congress 2014 – The impact of the Global Lung Initiative (GLI) reference equations and spirometry quality in all ages Year: 2014