Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 1321-1322



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
Kamath A. V., Myint P. K., Vowler S. L., Harrison B. D. W.. Is it time to rethink the urea criterion in CURB-65?. Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 1321-1322

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Is qSOFA score useful to determine proper place of hospitalization in CAP? Source: International Congress 2017 – The acute patient: the clinical point-of-view Year: 2017 CURB-65 pneumonia severity assessment adapted for electronic decision support Source: Annual Congress 2010 - The prognosis of community-acquired pneumonia: old and new markers of severity Year: 2010 What do we need from our patients? - the clinician's point of view Source: International Congress 2014 – PG17 Lung cancer: the issue with the tissue Year: 2014 Paper acceptance time in respiratory research: room for improvement? Source: Eur Respir J , 49 (2) 1601951; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01951-2016 Year: 2017 Compliance with CURB-65 score and the consequences of no implementation Source: Annual Congress 2011 - New aspects in prevention and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and lower respiratory tract infections Year: 2011 COPD: time to improve its taxonomy? Source: ERJ Open Res, 4 (1) 00132-2017; 10.1183/23120541.00132-2017 Year: 2018 Incorporating age adjusted d-dimer limit in place of differential cut-off in YEARS algorithm. Does it help to reduce CTPA burden? Source: International Congress 2019 – Pulmonary embolism: from diagnosis to prognosis and treatment Year: 2019 Acceptance criteria for intensive care: we need new definitions and legislations for futile treatment! Source: International Congress 2017 – COPD and weaning Year: 2017 Recognizing the high-risk patients with sepsis on time: MEWS, qSOFA or SIRS? Source: International Congress 2019 – Recent developments in intensive care unit medicine Year: 2019 ICU Physiotherapist’s early mobilization theoretical and practical knowledge: What do they know? Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Physiotherapy in acute respiratory care Year: 2020 Assessment and treatment of comorbidity: what efforts pay off? Source: Annual Congress 2011 - The non-parmacological management of COPD exacerbations Year: 2011 Does it matter which set of observations are used to calculate the CURB65 score for pneumonia? Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Assessment of severity and predictors of outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia Year: 2011 Workable instruments and tools realising active patient participation: a set of criteria from the patient's perspective Source: Annual Congress 2011 - The value of patients as partners in research Year: 2011 Validation of C-Reactive protein and CURB-65 in the first hospital admission community acquired-pneumonia patient  as a predictor of 30 days mortality Source: International Congress 2018 – Improving the outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia Year: 2018 Reasons that justify hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients with CURB-65 score 0-1 Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Treatment and outcome in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia Year: 2008 Physicians or prediction rules; who is better at predicting prognosis? Source: Eur Respir J 2007; 30: Suppl. 51, 124s Year: 2007 The clinican's dilemma - when is biopsy required? Source: Research Seminar 2010 - Novel insights in pulmonary fibrogenesis: from bench to bedside Research Seminar Year: 2010 NIV to favour extubation: let's look beyond COPD Source: Annual Congress 2013 –PG11 NIV in growth areas Year: 2013