Comparison between ASV and PCV in severe COPD patients

A. Lorx, Z. Ivanyi, I. Penzes (Budapest, Hungary)

Source: Annual Congress 2001 - Monitoring acute lung disease
Session: Monitoring acute lung disease
Session type: Thematic Poster Session
Number: 1652
Disease area: Airway diseases, Respiratory critical care

Congress or journal article abstract

Abstract

ASV (Adapted Support Ventilation) is a unique form of pressure-targeted ventilation, which takes the prolonged time constant, the elevated lung compliance and the increased airway resistance into account, when the parameters are set. During PCV all the parameters are set by the physician, and remains the same until the next change. ASV therefore could provide a better breathing pattern, minimizing the operating lung volume, and reducing the danger of lung injury.
We compared the effect of ASV and PCV (Pressure Control Ventilation) on the respiratory system mechanics in intubated COPD patients (14) with the (Ventrak) Resp. Mech. Monitoring system with CO2 monitoring and esophageal balloon catheter.
Pressure-Time Product (PTP) (13.9±]1.3 vs 3.0±]1.96), I/E ratio (1.6±]3.3 vs. 3.2±]0.4) and PEEPi (16±]2.8 vs. 11±]2.4) was significantly higher using PCV, while the respiratory system Compliance (105±]14 vs. 233±]30.1) was lower (mean±]SD ANOVA p<0.05).
ASV provides a comparable level of minute ventilation, respiratory rate. If no patient trigger occurs ASV provide a lower I/E ratio, higher lung compliance and lower PEEPi and PTP, which suggest a lower operating lung volume. During spontaneous activity the ASV mode provides pressure supported breathes with the same pressure level as in controlled breathes, which results in a longer I/E ratio, higher tidal volume, and higher operating lung volume as during the passive breathes.


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
A. Lorx, Z. Ivanyi, I. Penzes (Budapest, Hungary). Comparison between ASV and PCV in severe COPD patients. Eur Respir J 2001; 16: Suppl. 31, 1652

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Characterization of patients with severe COPD
Source: International Congress 2018 – COPD around the world
Year: 2018

Changes in FEV1 and SpO2 in patients with severe and very severe COPD
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Lung function testing in the management of obstructive diseases
Year: 2021

Predictors of poor outcome in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) receiving noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV
Source: International Congress 2015 – Outcome of noninvasive ventilatory support in acute and chronic respiratory failure
Year: 2015


Care-continuity for COPD patients
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Nursing led education and follow-up strategies: impact on readmission, self care and patient experiences
Year: 2012


COPD patients
Source: Eur Respir Monogr 2021; 90: 154-164
Year: 2021


Comparison of survival rate following non-invasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and non-COPD patients
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Noninvasive ventilation in the acute patient: outcome and pathophysiology
Year: 2010

Prognosis and evolution of COPD patients hospitalized and treated with non invasive ventilation
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –New evidence for NIV in the acute setting
Year: 2013


Comparison of clinical characteristics between stable COPD patients with- and without mild bronchiectasis
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 257s
Year: 2002

Evaluation of the individual bronchodilator response in patients with severe COPD
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 246s
Year: 2002

Impact of moderate and severe exacerbations in severe COPD patients
Source: International Congress 2018 – How far are we in terms of predicting mortality and exacerbations in COPD?
Year: 2018




Noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Acute respiratory failure and noninvasive mechanical ventilation
Year: 2007


Salmeterol/fluticasone therapy improves FEV1 in mild and moderate more than in severe COPD patients
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 342s
Year: 2004

Severe outcomes of COVID-19 among patients with COPD and asthma
Source: ERJ Open Res, 7 (1) 00594-2020; 10.1183/23120541.00594-2020
Year: 2021



Predictors of survival in severe COPD patients initiated on chronic NIV
Source: International Congress 2016 – New horizons for noninvasive ventilation in acute and chronic settings
Year: 2016

Comparison of the effectiveness of two schedules of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with severe COPD
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 555s
Year: 2006

Survival of COPD patients after their first episode of acute exacerbation treated with non-invasive ventilation
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Recent advances in noninvasive ventilation used for treating acute respiratory failure
Year: 2011


Compliance for NIMV treatment in moderate and severe OSAS patients
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Clinical predictors of OSA, adherence to CPAP and psychology
Year: 2012

Assessment of non-invasive ventilation in acute severe asthma patients
Source: Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation Conference 2020
Year: 2020



Predicting mortality in patients hospitalised with acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) requiring assisted ventilation
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - New scientific findings on noninvasive ventilation in the acute setting
Year: 2012



Treatment of acute exacerbations with non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) in chronic hypercapnic COPD patients with pulmonary hypertension
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Noninvasive ventilation in the acute patient: outcome and pathophysiology
Year: 2010