Diagnostic utility of the physical examination for pulmonary hypertension
Kevin Solverson (Calgary, Canada), Kevin Solverson, Daniel Vis, Micheal Braganza, Jeff Shaw, Luke Rannelli, Mitesh Thakrar, Rhea Varughese, Naushad Hirani, Doug Helmersen, Jason Weatherald
Source: International Congress 2016 – Pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary embolism: from the bench to the bedside
Disease area: Pulmonary vascular diseases
Abstract Background and Objective Little is known about the utility of physical examination (PE) findings in patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension (PH) in the modern era. We aimed to determine the diagnostic utility of commonly referenced PE findings for PH when compared to the gold standard, right heart catheterization (RHC)Methods Sequential patients undergoing RHC at the PH clinic in Calgary, Canada were prospectively enrolled and examined by a respirologist within 60 minutes of RHC. Examiners were blinded to indication and diagnosis. Examiners determined presence or absence of: high jugular venous pressure (JVP)>3cm, palpable P2, parasternal heave, abdominal-jugular reflex (AJR), loud P2, P2 louder than A2 (P2>A2), right-sided S3, and extra-physiologic splitting of S2. PE findings were compared to RHC to determine the sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive (+LR) and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) values for identifying PH (mPAP³ 25mmHg).Results 105 patients were enrolled. 66% were female with a median age of 61 (Interquartile Range 28-85). 13 patients (12%) did not have PH (mPAP <25 mmHg). The diagnostic performances of PE findings are displayed in Table 1. Table 1
Examination Finding Sn Sp +LR (95%CI) -LR(95%CI) JVP>3cm 70 67 2.1 (0.9-4.7) 0.45 (0.27-0.76) Palpable P2 31 62 0.82 (0.38-1.7) 1.1 (0.7-1.7) Parasternal heave 40 79 1.8 (0.63-4.9) 0.77 (0.55-1.1) AJR 55 69 1.8 (0.77-4.1) 0.66 (0.42-1.0) Loud P2 81 31 1.2 (0.8-1.7) 0.6 (0.24-1.5) P2>A2 66 54 1.4 (0.8-2.6) 0.6 (0.24-1.5) Right-sided S3 15 92 2.0 (0.3-13.8) 0.91 (0.8-1.1) Extra-physiologic Split S2 21 92 2.7 (0.4-18.6) 0.86 (0.7-1.0)
Conclusions The physical examination has inadequate diagnostic utility in detecting or excluding the presence of PH.
Rating:
You must login to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
Kevin Solverson (Calgary, Canada), Kevin Solverson, Daniel Vis, Micheal Braganza, Jeff Shaw, Luke Rannelli, Mitesh Thakrar, Rhea Varughese, Naushad Hirani, Doug Helmersen, Jason Weatherald. Diagnostic utility of the physical examination for pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2016; 48: Suppl. 60, 2480
You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
Related content which might interest you:
Related content which might interest you: