Source: Annual Congress 2001 - Measurements of lung function
Disease area: Airway diseases



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
L. Hancox, S. L. Hill (Birmingham, United Kingdom). Is the forced expiratory volume in 6 seconds (FEV₆) a more reproducible and accurate measurement than forced vital capacity (FVC) in obstructive and normal/restrictive patients. Eur Respir J 2001; 16: Suppl. 31, 185

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Should forced expiratory volume in six seconds replace forced vital capacity to detect airway obstruction? Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 1244-1250 Year: 2006 Forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in six seconds as predictors of reduced total lung capacity Source: Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 391-395 Year: 2008 The acceptability criterion for the difference between the forced inspiratory vital capacity (FIVC) and the forced vital capacity (FVC) are too strict? Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Future advances in respiratory physiology Year: 2021 Is forced expiratory volume in six seconds a valid alternative to forced vital capacity? Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: 1288-1289 Year: 2006 FEV6 as a surrogate for FVC in detecting airways obstruction and restriction in the workplace Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 374-377 Year: 2006 Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and peak expiratory flow (PEF): is there a correlation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients? Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 213s Year: 2001 The inclusion of peak expiratory flow (PEF) among selection criteria of the ”best test“ may increase diagnostic ability of forced vital capacity (FVC) Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 202s Year: 2001 Use of forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second quality criteria for determining a valid test Source: Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 1283-1292 Year: 2015 Sources of variation in forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 767-773 Year: 2006 The relationship between peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and forced expiratroy volume in the first second (FEV1) at low levels of FEV1. Implications for the assessment of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) in primary care Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 397s Year: 2002 FEF25-75% should not yet be used to define a bronchodilator response in individuals Source: Annual Congress 2005 - Spirometry - now and in the future Year: 2005 Can the prediction point for FEV1 / FVC be determined in patients with insufficient expiratory maneuver to determine airflow obstruction? Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Advances in lung function testing Year: 2020 Annual decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) in patients with COPD before and after introduction of tiotropium Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Pathogenesis and treatment of asthma and COPD Year: 2008 Obstructive ventilatory defect with normal forced expiratory volume in one second/vital capacity ratio Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 1069-1070 Year: 2006 Osteoprotogerin plasma concentrations is correlate with forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1) in patients with COPD Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Systemic and airway biomarkers in respiratory diseases Year: 2013 FEV6 or FVC to detect airway obstruction in the community setting? Source: Annual Congress 2007 - PG17 - Lung function measurement in the community Year: 2007 Auscultatory forced expiratory time as a predictor of FEV1 and as a clinical test of airway obstruction Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 225s Year: 2004 Ratio between forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of VC and FVC as a determinant of airway reactivity and sensitivity to methacholine Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 219s Year: 2006 Does negative expiratory pressure (NEP) influence the performances of forced expiratory manoeuvres in elderly patient? Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 32s Year: 2002 Predicted values for the forced expiratory flow adjusted for forced vital capacity, a descriptive study Source: ERJ Open Res, 6 (4) 00426-2020; 10.1183/23120541.00426-2020 Year: 2020