Comparison of exercise provocation and induced sputum measurement in patients with positive methacholine provocation test Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 371s Year: 2005
FENO is not a substitute for the methacholine challenge test in children Source: International Congress 2018 – Paediatric asthma: new mechanisms and tools Year: 2018
Relationship between bronchodilator response measured by FEV0.5 and methacholine provocation test in children from 3 to 15 years old Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Paediatric lung function, imaging and methodology in health and disease Year: 2009
Attempt to decrease of laboriousness of bronchial provocation test with allergen (sBPT) Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 583s Year: 2005
Respiratory impedance response to a deep inhalation (DI) in children during methacholine (MCh) challenge Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 347s Year: 2001
Diagnostic performance of the weight-corrected methacholine bronchial challenge test in children Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 172s Year: 2002
Alterations in static lung volumes during methacholine challenge (MCH) tests, assessed by whole-body plethysmography using the aerosol provocation system (APS) Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Bronchial challenge as a biomarker of respiratory disease Year: 2012
Methacholine challenge testing with a single low methacholine concentration Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Airway hyperresponsiveness: mechanism and assessment Year: 2009
The (un)importance of the time-interval between inhalation and FEV1 measurement in a methacholine challenge test Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 183s Year: 2004
30 Seconds tidal breathing method with AeroEclipse II nebulizer (AE) versus aerosol provocation system (APS) in methacholine challenge testing Source: International Congress 2014 – Airways: reversibility and responsiveness Year: 2014
Methacholine challenge test with impulse oscillometry versus spirometry: which is more sensitive in detecting airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR?) Source: International Congress 2018 – Clinical and functional monitoring in airway disease Year: 2018
Impulse oscillometry (IOS) vs plethismographic methods to detect PD20 in the methacholine challenge test Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Lung and airway function Year: 2011
Comparison of FEV1 and PEF values in cough variant asthma during methacholine challenge test Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Cough, airway hyperresponsiveness and asthma control Year: 2010
Mannitol dry powder challenge in comparison with exercise testing and methacholine challenge test in children Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Assessment of inflammation, hyperresponsiveness and response to exercise in asthmatic children Year: 2008
Forced oscillation technique: an alternative outcome measure for methacholine provocation test. Source: International Congress 2017 – Best abstracts in lung function Year: 2017
Single and multiple breath washout as compared to the Metacholine test in patients with suspected asthma Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Exhaled biomarkers of asthma and the asthma burden Year: 2020
Specificity and sensitivity of the methacholine challenge test for the diagnosis of asthma in athletes Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Predicting the future: the impact of reference values on a range of respiratory paramaters Year: 2012
Bronchial provocation tests with dry powder mannitol versus histamine: value for clinical practice and relation to eNO Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Accuracy in lung function testing Year: 2009
Bronchodilation by deep inhalation (DI) during exercise induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in children Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 225s Year: 2002