Evaluation of prevalence of COPD according to different criteria

A. Lindberg, L. G. Larsson, A. C. Jonsson, B. Lundbäck (Luleå, Stockholm, Sweden)

Source: Annual Congress 2002 - Prevalence and costs of COPD
Session: Prevalence and costs of COPD
Session type: Thematic Poster Session
Number: 827
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstract

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate differences in prevalence of COPD dependent on definitions according to British Thoracic Society (BTS), Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), and American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria.
Design: A cross-sectional epidemilogical survey of a general population sample in Norrbotten, the northernmost province of Sweden. A postal questionnaire was followed by a structured interview and lung function test during 1995.
Participants: 666 randomly selected adults aged 20-72 in Norrbotten, of whom 643 (50% women) performed a lung function test.
Results: The spirometric criteria of COPD according to BTS (FEV1/FVC < 0,70, FEV1 < 80 % predicted), GOLD (FEV1/FVC < 0,70) and ATS (FEV1/FVC <0,75) were fulfilled by 7.6%, 13.2% and 31.6%, respectively. In age class 20-45 years (n:258) the prevalences were 3.9%, 7.0%, 20.2%, and in age class 46-72 years (n:385) 10.1%, 17.4% 39.2%, respectively. Of the study sample, 45 % were non-smokers, 28% ex-smokers and 27% current smokers. Among non-smokers the prevalences were 3.4%, 5.5%, 21.4%, in ex-smokers 8.8%, 15.9%, 37.9%, and in current smokers 13.5%, 23.4%, 42.1%, respectively, according to the BTS, GOLD and ATS spirometric criteria.
Conclusion: The expected pattern with increasing prevalence with age and relationship to smoking habits was obvious independently of criteria, but the prevalence of COPD was highly dependent on the used criteria. BTS yielded the lowest figures and ATS the highest. In epidemiological studies of COPD, an exact definition of the criteria for COPD is necessary in order to make it possible to evaluate and compare findings.


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
A. Lindberg, L. G. Larsson, A. C. Jonsson, B. Lundbäck (Luleå, Stockholm, Sweden). Evaluation of prevalence of COPD according to different criteria. Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 827

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Comparing the different diagnostic criteria of Asthma and COPD overlap
Source: International Congress 2018 – Biomarkers of COPD and asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS)
Year: 2018




Population based study on the prevalence of COPD by spirometric criteria
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Prevalence and incidence of asthma and COPD
Year: 2010


Combined assessment according to the new GOLD guidelines and its relation to outcome in COPD
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - GOLD guidelines 2011: new assessment of COPD
Year: 2012

COPD severity analysis according to current evaluation criteria – National survey
Source: International Congress 2015 – Clinical assessment and monitoring of asthma and COPD
Year: 2015


Health status in the GOLD guidelines era. Assessing the new COPD severity staging criteria
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 251s
Year: 2002

Prevalence and clinical characteristics of asthma-COPD overlap syndrome according to accepted criteria
Source: International Congress 2017 – COPD biomarkers
Year: 2017


Distribution of COPD phenotypes according to the Spanish COPD guidelines in clinical practice
Source: International Congress 2015 – Notable abstracts in COPD: variety
Year: 2015



The current ERS, BTS, ATS and GOLD classification criteria underestimate the impact of COPD on patients
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 254s
Year: 2002

Effectiveness of tiotropium in low-risk patients according to new GOLD severity grading
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Translational respiratory medicine in asthma and COPD
Year: 2012

Population impact of different definitions of COPD
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 201s
Year: 2001

Prevalence and severity of GOLD defined COPD in adults
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 123s
Year: 2002

The effect of different symptom and risk assessments in classifying pulmonary rehabilitation patients according to the new GOLD guidelines
Source: International Congress 2014 – Non inflammatory monitoring of airway diseases
Year: 2014


Useful malnutrition diagnostic criteria for stable COPD in Japanese patients
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical and functional evaluation of COPD
Year: 2020


Distribution and significance of GOLD 2011 disease severity classification in patients with COPD in China: A national cross-sectional survey
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –COPD: acute exacerbations and others
Year: 2013

The impact of using different symptom-based exacerbation definitions in COPD patients
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Exacerbations and COPD and rehabilitation
Year: 2010

Definition, epidemiology and diagnostic criteria of IPF and how these guidelines were developed
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence based guidelines and recommendations for clinical management - Results of the joint ATS/ERS/JRS taskforce
Year: 2009


Impact of different spirometric definitions on COPD prevalence and biomarkers in a population-based sample up to age 90
Source: International Congress 2015 – Epidemiology of respiratory disease
Year: 2015

Relationship between quality of life and severity of COPD according to GOLD classification
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 15s
Year: 2004

Prevalence of comorbidities in established and newly treated patients with COPD according to GOLD 2017 in a UK primary care population
Source: International Congress 2018 – Interdependence of COPD and comorbidities and the underlying mechanisms
Year: 2018