Impact of severity on three spirometric definitions of COPD

B. Schau, R. J. Halbert, B. R. Celli (Ingelheim, Germany; Santa Monica, Boston, United States Of America)

Source: Annual Congress 2002 - Prevalence and costs of COPD
Session: Prevalence and costs of COPD
Session type: Thematic Poster Session
Number: 821
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstract

Abstract

Different definitions of airway obstruction produce prevalence estimates that can differ widely. In order to determine how this difference varies by the severity of obstruction, we used data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) to examine airway obstruction in a representative sample of US adults aged 30-75. Obstruction and severity strata were defined using the criteria of the American Thoracic Society (ATS), European Respiratory Society (ERS), and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Using ATS criteria, obstruction rates per 1,000 were 98.2 (Stage I - minimal), 27.3 (Stage I – Mild), 8.8 (Stage II), and 4.5 (Stage III). For ERS criteria, rates were 234.6 per 1,000 (Mild), 44.9 (Moderate), and 14.4 (Severe). Using the GOLD criteria, rates of obstruction were 86.9 (Stage I), 59.4 (Stage IIA), 12.1 (Stage IIB), and 1.6 (Stage III). For patients with FEV1/FVC below 50% predicted, the criteria varied by less than 1 per 1,000 (ATS = 13.4, ERS = 14.4, GOLD = 13.7). For milder disease (FEV1/FVC > 50% predicted), there was over 100% variance (ATS = 125.5, ERS = 279.5, GOLD = 146.3). The GOLD and ATS criteria performed very similarly across subgroups of age, sex, race, and smoking status, while the ERS criteria consistently produced higher estimates among persons with milder obstruction, across these subgroups. Population differences between measures of obstruction primarily reflect different sensitivities in identifying persons with less severe disease.


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
B. Schau, R. J. Halbert, B. R. Celli (Ingelheim, Germany; Santa Monica, Boston, United States Of America). Impact of severity on three spirometric definitions of COPD. Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 821

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Effect of comorbidities on severity and clinical parameters of COPD
Source: International Congress 2018 – COPD and extrapulmonary comorbidities
Year: 2018

GOLD assessment of COPD patients: Impact of symptoms assessment choice
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - GOLD guidelines 2011: new assessment of COPD
Year: 2012

Comparison of spirometric markers of severity and reversibility in patients with asthma and/or COPD in NOVELTY
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – New tools for risk stratification of obstructive diseases
Year: 2020




Frequency and severity of exacerbations reflect COPD severity, but not COPD phenotype as determined by quantitative CT
Source: International Congress 2014 – Markers
Year: 2014

Impact of different spirometric definitions on COPD prevalence and biomarkers in a population-based sample up to age 90
Source: International Congress 2015 – Epidemiology of respiratory disease
Year: 2015

Comparison of spirometric z-scores with FEV1 percent prediction in predicting exacerbations in elderly COPD patients
Source: International Congress 2016 – In-patient and out-patient COPD management
Year: 2016


Scales of assesment in COPD. Correlation with clinical and functional parameters
Source: International Congress 2015 – COPD: exacerbations, gas exchange and associated dysfunction
Year: 2015


Impact of the nutritional status on pulmonary function in COPD patients
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Respiratory and cardiovascular abnormalities in COPD: the role of exercise, nutritional status and inflammation
Year: 2013


Assessing COPD profiles and outcomes by dyspnoea severity
Source: International Congress 2016 – Novel avenues in the treatment of COPD I
Year: 2016


Change in clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ) symptoms domain score and FEV1 predict treatment failure during hospitalisation due to COPD exacerbations
Source: Eur Respir J 2007; 30: Suppl. 51, 525s
Year: 2007

Impact of lung function impairment and exacerbation history on COPD patient-reported utility
Source: International Congress 2014 – COPD markers
Year: 2014

Comparison of CAT and mMRC in evaluating clinical symptoms co-morbidity and medical resource utilization in COPD patients
Source: International Congress 2014 – Non inflammatory monitoring of airway diseases
Year: 2014

Responsiveness of different multidimensional severity indices to pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Physiotherapy and rehabilitative interventions applied to different populations with respiratory impairment
Year: 2012


Determinants of severity of dyspnea in COPD
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –COPD mechanisms
Year: 2013


Correlation of various parameters with FEV1 in the assessment of asthma severity
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 51s
Year: 2001

Population based study on the prevalence of COPD by spirometric criteria
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Prevalence and incidence of asthma and COPD
Year: 2010


The impact of using different symptom-based exacerbation definitions in COPD patients
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Exacerbations and COPD and rehabilitation
Year: 2010

Prediction of lung emphysema in COPD by spirometry and clinical symptoms: results from COSYCONET
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Lung function testing in the management of obstructive diseases
Year: 2021


Impact of comorbidities in COPD prognosys scores
Source: International Congress 2016 – Features and impact of comorbidities in COPD
Year: 2016


Usefulness of severity predictive scores in COPD exacerbations in hospitalized patients
Source: International Congress 2016 – Novel avenues in the treatment of COPD I
Year: 2016