REG endpoint validation: Do database asthma control measures predict future risk?

G. Brusselle, R. J. Martin, A. Burden, A. Dima, E. Pizzichini, J. Holbrook, N. G. Papadopoulos, T. Popov, G. Colice, H. K. Reddel, J. von Ziegenweidt, A. Chisholm, D. Price (Ghent, Florianópolis, Belgium; Denver, Baltimore, Washington, United States Of America; Cambridge, Aberdeen, United Kingdom; Amsterdam, Netherlands; Athens, Greece; Sofia, Bulgaria; Sydney, Australia)

Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Session: Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Session type: Poster Discussion
Number: 3022
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstract

Abstract

Aim: Improved understanding of patient characteristics associated with exacerbations (EXBs) may provide opportunity to minimize future risk. We assessed whether database asthma control can predict future EXBs.Methods: Used a research database to select clinical records of patients aged 18–60yrs with an asthma diagnosis, continuous records over 1 baseline & 1 outcome yr and no other chronic respiratory disease or maintenance oral steroids. Two baseline control measures were evaluated: risk domain asthma control (RDAC) & overall control (OAC). RDAC was absence of: exacerbations, unplanned asthma-related out patient appointments, and antibiotics with evidence of respiratory review (ABX). OAC was: RDAC+average salbutamol £200µg/day. RDAC/OAC components predictive of outcome EXBs in univariable models were entered into a multivariable model and stepwise reduced. EXBs were: oral steroid courses with evidence of respiratory review (OS), asthma-related hospital admission or emergency room [ER] attendance.Results: Of 1558 patients (60% female), 73% and 42% satisfied criteria for RDAC and OAC control, respectively, at baseline.

Baseline Predictors of EXB risk
 Rate Ratio(95%CI)p-value
Univariable analysis
RDAC (uncontrolled)*2.78(2.04–3.70)<0.001
OAC (uncontrolled)*1.69(1.23–2.33)<0.001
 
OS01.00 
 12.33(1.58–3.42)<0.001
 £22.53(1.54–4.17) 
ER attendance01.00 
 11.58(1.06–2.34)<0.001
 £22.43(1.59–3.71) 
ER attendance01.000.037
 £12.21(1.05–4.66) 

Conclusions: Classification as RDAC or OAC at baseline predicted lower EXB rates in the following year. OS, ABX and asthma-related ER attendance independently predicted increased EXB risk regardless of “current control” as indicated by salbutamol use.
*Controlled RR=1.00


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
G. Brusselle, R. J. Martin, A. Burden, A. Dima, E. Pizzichini, J. Holbrook, N. G. Papadopoulos, T. Popov, G. Colice, H. K. Reddel, J. von Ziegenweidt, A. Chisholm, D. Price (Ghent, Florianópolis, Belgium; Denver, Baltimore, Washington, United States Of America; Cambridge, Aberdeen, United Kingdom; Amsterdam, Netherlands; Athens, Greece; Sofia, Bulgaria; Sydney, Australia). REG endpoint validation: Do database asthma control measures predict future risk?. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: Suppl. 58, 3022

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
REG endpoint validation: Association between database and patient-reported exacerbations
Source: International Congress 2014 – Respiratory symptoms in primary care populations
Year: 2014

REG endpoint validation: Do SABA prescribing records reliably reflect patient-reported reliever use?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Respiratory symptoms in primary care populations
Year: 2014

An integrated tool to measure the burden of COPD, the assessment of burden of COPD (ABC)-scale: Development and validity
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of COPD in primary care
Year: 2014

Development of a decision tree based on real life primary care data: Can we predict the diagnoses asthma, COPD and asthma/COPD overlap syndrome based on automatic data analysis?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Diagnosing and managing asthma and COPD in primary care
Year: 2014


Can we improve the follow up of asthmatic patients with asthma educational program (PAMA)?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014


COPD detected with screening: Impact on patient management and prognosis
Source: International Congress 2014 – Diagnosing and managing asthma and COPD in primary care
Year: 2014



PRISMS: A systematic meta-review of the evidence on supporting asthma self-management
Source: International Congress 2014 – Diagnosing and managing asthma and COPD in primary care
Year: 2014

Variables related with a COPD diagnosis trough an active research: On-detect study
Source: International Congress 2014 – Respiratory disease management in primary care
Year: 2014



INhaler compliance assessment in the community (INCA GP)
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014


Risk factors for uncontrolled asthma in a Swedish asthma population – Results from the PRAXIS-study
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014

Burden of asthma on resource and productivity in distinct patient clusters
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014

Assessment of patients with COPD according to previous and new GOLD: Which stage in which group?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Diagnosis and treatment of COPD in primary care
Year: 2014


Implementing asthma self-management – A systematic review of implementation studies
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014

Whether all general practice initiatives are effective in gaining asthma control in mild asthmatics?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014


Do we classify by feeling mixed COPD-asthma phenotype patients with GesEPOC?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014

Comparison of the effects of two rehabilitation methods in COPD subjects
Source: International Congress 2014 – Diagnosis and treatment of COPD in primary care
Year: 2014

The Australian asthma handbook: Practical and accessible guidelines for primary care
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014


HELP-COPD: A qualitative study of need in people with severe COPD
Source: International Congress 2014 – Respiratory symptoms in primary care populations
Year: 2014

Do we treat different COPD patients depending on the guideline we use?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of COPD in primary care
Year: 2014

What influences change in DOSE index in a seven year follow-up?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Diagnosing and managing asthma and COPD in primary care
Year: 2014