Can we improve the follow up of asthmatic patients with asthma educational program (PAMA)?

L. Lamarca Fornell, X. Flor Escriche, S. álvarez álvarez, M. Estruch Francitorra, E. Ares Fernández, C. Alos Manrique, C. Santiago Fernández, M. Reverté Simó, E. Pérez Mayo, A. Raventos Castany, G. Sanchez Sanchez, T. Tovar Velasco, M. V. Feijoo Rodriguez (Barcelona, Spain)

Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Session: Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Session type: Poster Discussion
Number: 3021
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstractE-poster

Abstract

Asthma prevalence has increased, becoming a health and economic problem, mainly due to poor control of the disease.OBJECTIVESTo determine if PAMA implementation:-Improves disease control and patients' quality of life-Reduces number of exacerbations and emergency visits due to asthmaSecondary:-To determine optimal PAMA application frequencyMETHODSA 3 years long RCT, in 10 urban primary care teams, to evaluate PAMA which includes: patient education: inhalation systems, exacerbation symptoms and treatment action plan, asthma control test (ACT), revision of patient's technique and delivery of behaviours to avoid list.Data were collected in an interview with his doctor or nurse. Main data: age, gender, smoking status, asthma severity, treatment, exacerbations, hospital admissions, ACT and quality of life test (mini-AQLQ).BASELINE RESULTS498 asthmatic patients were included and randomized into 3 intervention groups: I: PAMA application every 6 months:124; II: every 12 months:120; III: every 18 months:115 and control group: (usual management):139.Average age 49 years old (SD 16.4). 72% women. 36.9% had intermittent asthma, and 40% moderate persistent, 24.1% presented partially controlled and 5.8% uncontrolled asthma.47% had no follow-up visits and 51.4% presented exacerbations in the last year with 0.7(SD 1.1) average emergency visits for patient, 55.7% were attended in primary care and 30.9% solved with self-management or phone instructions. Average ACT scoring: 20.9(SD 4.2) and mini-AQLQ: 5.7(SD 1.1).CONCLUSIONSThe implementation of an educational program with scheduled follow-up visits can reduce the exacerbations as well as improve the asthma control and quality of life.


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
L. Lamarca Fornell, X. Flor Escriche, S. álvarez álvarez, M. Estruch Francitorra, E. Ares Fernández, C. Alos Manrique, C. Santiago Fernández, M. Reverté Simó, E. Pérez Mayo, A. Raventos Castany, G. Sanchez Sanchez, T. Tovar Velasco, M. V. Feijoo Rodriguez (Barcelona, Spain). Can we improve the follow up of asthmatic patients with asthma educational program (PAMA)?. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: Suppl. 58, 3021

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Whether all general practice initiatives are effective in gaining asthma control in mild asthmatics?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014


INhaler compliance assessment in the community (INCA GP)
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014


Comparison of three forms of inter-professional education on clinical and humanistic outcomes for people with asthma
Source: International Congress 2014 – Respiratory symptoms in primary care populations
Year: 2014

Implementing asthma self-management – A systematic review of implementation studies
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014

Comparison of the effects of two rehabilitation methods in COPD subjects
Source: International Congress 2014 – Diagnosis and treatment of COPD in primary care
Year: 2014

The Australian asthma handbook: Practical and accessible guidelines for primary care
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014


Parameters influencing the participation in an asthma education course for adult asthma patients – Results from the disease management program bronchial asthma in Germany (North Rhine Region)
Source: International Congress 2014 – Respiratory symptoms in primary care populations
Year: 2014


PRISMS: A systematic meta-review of the evidence on supporting asthma self-management
Source: International Congress 2014 – Diagnosing and managing asthma and COPD in primary care
Year: 2014

Burden of asthma on resource and productivity in distinct patient clusters
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014

Prevalence and diagnosis of asthma in General Practice after computerized Spanish guideline on the management of asthma (GEMA) and collaborative care environment
Source: International Congress 2014 – Medical education: web and internet
Year: 2014


Is parenteral adrenaline used unnecessarily in the treatment of asthma patients in the pre-hospital setting?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014


Burden of asthma on resource and productivity in 6 European countries
Source: International Congress 2014 – Respiratory symptoms in primary care populations
Year: 2014


A survey of the perception of asthma by primary care physicians in Republic of Moldova
Source: International Congress 2014 – Respiratory symptoms in primary care populations
Year: 2014

A multidisciplinary clinic for children with severe asthma: Clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization
Source: International Congress 2014 – More paediatric asthma
Year: 2014

REG endpoint validation: Do database asthma control measures predict future risk?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014

Interprofessional delivery of asthma care: Are health providers ready? Do patients want it?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014

COPD detected with screening: Impact on patient management and prognosis
Source: International Congress 2014 – Diagnosing and managing asthma and COPD in primary care
Year: 2014



REG endpoint validation: Association between database and patient-reported exacerbations
Source: International Congress 2014 – Respiratory symptoms in primary care populations
Year: 2014

Do we classify by feeling mixed COPD-asthma phenotype patients with GesEPOC?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014

Asthma control and interest in participation in patient education seminars: Data from the integrated care of asthma in Switzerland (INCAS)-study
Source: International Congress 2014 – Latest insights in chronic care
Year: 2014