Skin prick test allergen batch differences and duplicate skin prick tests: Which are important?

G. Thomsen, V. Schlünssen, L. Skadhauge, T. H. Malling, D. Sherson, O. Omland, T. Sigsgard (Esbjerg, Aarhua, Aarhus, Aalborg, Odense, Denmark)

Source: International Congress 2014 – Clinical allergy
Session: Clinical allergy
Session type: Thematic Poster Session
Number: 4021
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstract

Abstract

Background:Skin prick tests (SPT) are widely used both in clinical practice and in research. The standardizationof the allergen extracts is well documented to be crucial for the validity of SPT, whereas lessemphasis has been on reproducibility and the SPT procedure itself.Objective: To study how the duplicate skin prick test procedure influence the sensitivity andspecificity of the test and to analyse the differences in wheal size in skin prick tests with twobatches of allergen extracts from same vendor.Methods:The association between rhinitis and SPT was assessed among 1135 subjects from a generalpopulation sample. SPT was performed twice with 10 common aeroallergens. In a subsample of 90persons SPT was performed simultaneously with five of the allergens using two different batchesResults:Thirty percent had at least one positive SPT. Only minor disagreements were seen between the sizesof two wheals from the same batch. A second SPT with the same batch did not change theassociation between rhinitis and sensitization. When performing SPT with two different batchesdisagreement was observed in 2 % (Birch) to 11% (Dog) of the subjects.Conclusions:Performing SPT twice with the same allergen batch does not enhance the validity of the test, andduplicate testing cannot be recommended. Considerable difference in SPT response was observedwhen using different batches from the same vendor. Thus, inter batch differences in allergenextracts might be a source of variability.


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
G. Thomsen, V. Schlünssen, L. Skadhauge, T. H. Malling, D. Sherson, O. Omland, T. Sigsgard (Esbjerg, Aarhua, Aarhus, Aalborg, Odense, Denmark). Skin prick test allergen batch differences and duplicate skin prick tests: Which are important?. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: Suppl. 58, 4021

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Skin prick test versus specific IgE – A comparative study in patients with bronchial asthma and allergic rhinitis in India
Source: International Congress 2014 – Clinical allergy
Year: 2014

Skin prick tests & identification of common household allergens in naso-bronchial allergic disorders in Southern India
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Genetics and mechanisms of, and tests for, allergy
Year: 2013


Clinical relevance of positive skin prick test to house dust mite in Portugal and Finland
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Genetics and mechanisms of, and tests for, allergy
Year: 2013


Measurement and analysis of the common food allergens specific IgE
Source: International Congress 2014 – Clinical allergy
Year: 2014

Skin prick test
Source: Procedure Video 2015
Year: 2015

Assessing the clinical significance of conjunctival provocation test with standardized extracts of dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in pediatric respiratory allergic disease
Source: International Congress 2014 – More paediatric asthma
Year: 2014

Does low prevalence of pig allergy among Danish farmers reflect flaws in the skin prick test?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Occupational asthma, abestosis and silicosis
Year: 2014


Aspergillus skin hypersensitivity in patients of COPD
Source: International Congress 2014 – Clinical allergy
Year: 2014

Skin prick test response to inhalant allergens in Chinese asthmatics
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 433s
Year: 2001

Allergen microarray detection of specific IgE in southern Chinese pollen allergy patients
Source: International Congress 2014 – Paediatric asthma: epidemiology and risk factors
Year: 2014

Comparison of immunology tests for determining sensitisation to mouse proteins in laboratory animal workers
Source: International Congress 2015 – Work, environment and the epidemiology of asthma
Year: 2015

Changes in pollen sensitization over last twenty years in Tunisia
Source: International Congress 2015 – Novel mechanisms and treatments in allergy and asthma
Year: 2015


Dynamic change of house dust mites and its components- sIgE and sIgG4 in specific immunotherapy
Source: International Congress 2014 – Intervening in allergic asthma
Year: 2014


Differences in skin prick test reactivity among children according to different aeroallergens
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 523s
Year: 2002

Agreement between atopy from skin prick testing (SPT) and questionnaire report of allergy
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Methods in respiratory epidemiology
Year: 2010

Usefulness of nasal provocation test in the diagnosis of mite allergic rhinitis: Standard or rapid?
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Genetics and mechanisms of, and tests for, allergy
Year: 2013

Gender difference in skin prick sensitivity to allergens in 10-15 year cases with respiratory symptoms vs controls in Sicily and Malta
Source: International Congress 2014 – Epidemiology of asthma
Year: 2014


Hypersensitivity skin-prick test with common allergens, immunoglobulin E level and their genetic association with interleukin 13 among asthmatics in Sudan
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Studies of asthma in man
Year: 2013


The allergy to insulin about a case treated by montelukast
Source: International Congress 2014 – Clinical allergy
Year: 2014