Sensitivity and specificity of the Juniper's asthma control questionnaire scores for the assessment of good vs poor asthma control: results of the J.A.C.I.N.T.E survey

Y. Martinat, Y. Rogeaux, K. Mezzi (Lyon, Villeneuve d'Ascq, Cergy, France)

Source: Annual Congress 2002 - Asthma in primary care - Assessment and control
Session: Asthma in primary care - Assessment and control
Session type: Thematic Poster Session
Number: 587
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstract

Abstract

On the basis of a French observational survey performed in September-November 2000, several scores of the Juniper's asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) were assessed to determine a reasonable cut-off value allowing to define asthma control. A total of 1218 patients completed the questionnaire; in parallel, asthma control was assessed by their physician with a pragmatic interiew based on three criteria: no nocturnal symptoms during the last 5 days, no exercise dyspnoea, no more than two intakes of β2-agonists during the last 7 days. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for various ACQ scores. A ROC analysis was performed, showing the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity for a cut-off point at 1.25.
Juniper score 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 3.00
Sensitivity 0.987 0.968 0.927 0.907 0.841 0.764 0.680 0.640 0.446
Specificity 0.274 0.574 0.761 0.803 0.908 0.932 0.966 0.979 0.997
Even if, when interviewed by their physician, controlled patients should ideally be using no β2-agonists, have no nocturnal symptoms and no exercise dyspnoea, these preliminary results offer a useful approach in the public domain for trying to decide what Juniper's ACQ score should be used for including patients in clinical trials and for adjusting asthma treatment in routine practice.


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
Y. Martinat, Y. Rogeaux, K. Mezzi (Lyon, Villeneuve d'Ascq, Cergy, France). Sensitivity and specificity of the Juniper's asthma control questionnaire scores for the assessment of good vs poor asthma control: results of the J.A.C.I.N.T.E survey. Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 587

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Validation of the asthma control questionnaire (ACQ): results from the gaining optimal asthma control (GOAL) study
Source: Annual Congress 2004 - Asthma and perceived health status
Year: 2004


Assessing asthma control: asthma control questionnaire score versus a scoring system based on GINA
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 460s
Year: 2004

Measuring asthma control using the clinical questionnaire
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 46s
Year: 2001

Poor perceptions of asthma control: results of the international control of asthma symptoms (ICAS) GP survey
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 83s
Year: 2004

Poor perceptions and expectations of asthma control: results of the international control of asthma symptoms (ICAS) patient survey
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 83s
Year: 2004

How to measure asthma control? Asthma control questionnaire versus expert system
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 267s
Year: 2001

Perannual allergic rhinitis (PAR) impairs quality of life (QoL) in patients as assessed by the RFS: French validated generic questionnaire
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 113s
Year: 2002

Asthma questionnaires and diary cards: beyond functional monitoring
Source: Annual Congress 2006 - PG14 - Noninvasive monitoring of asthma inflammation and treatment
Year: 2006



Perceived and actual control in patients with severe asthma: results from a global online survey
Source: International Congress 2017 – Asthma: mechanisms and treatment
Year: 2017


Using the asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) to guide self-management in adults with asthma: an internet based approach
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Traditional and novel approaches to assess and achieve asthma control
Year: 2007


Asthma Control Questionnaire in children: validation, measurement properties, interpretation
Source: Eur Respir J 2010; 36: 1410-1416
Year: 2010



Level of agreement between five asthma control questionnaires
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Asthma: issues in rehabilitation and physical therapy
Year: 2011


Assessment of asthma control. Comparison of patient verbal perception v/s objective assessment through asthma control test
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Asthma control or asthma severity
Year: 2008


The role of education in the comparison between self and physician-administered asthma control test scores.
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Biomarkers to phenotype asthma: prediction of exacerbations
Year: 2021

Responsiveness of the asthma control test (ACT) to changes in specialists ratings of asthma control and FEV1
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 85s
Year: 2004

Asthma control questionnaire score (ACQ-5) predicts future risk of exacerbations
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Aspects of clinical asthma
Year: 2009

The association between the asthma control test and the asthma quality of life questionnaire in adult asthmatics
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Asthma: a heterogeneous disease
Year: 2011


The SAQ is a valid quality of life measure in severe asthma: the mini-AQLQ and ACQ both measure symptoms
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Phenotypes of obstructive diseases
Year: 2020


Depression, asthma control test and quality of life for asthmatic patients
Source: Eur Respir J 2007; 30: Suppl. 51, 17s
Year: 2007

Concordance between the new questionnaires to evaluate asthma control
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Update on monitoring airway diseases
Year: 2011