The prognostic value of KRAS mutation according to the gene's

C. Boch, J. Kollmeier, A. Roth, D. Misch, T. Weiß, A. Streubel, T. Mairinger, T. T. Bauer (Berlin, Germany)

Source: International Congress 2014 – Pathology and prognostic factors of thoracic tumours
Session: Pathology and prognostic factors of thoracic tumours
Session type: Poster Discussion
Number: 511
Disease area: Thoracic oncology

Congress or journal article abstract

Abstract

Introduction: A point mutation in the KRAS gene is the most frequent mutation in NSCLC. It is predominantly detected in codon 12 and 13. For patients with resected NSCLC and adjuvant chemotherapy, recent findings indicate a survival advantage for the subgroup with a KRAS mutation in codon 12 vs. 13. In the present study we analysed differences of overall survival in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC in dependence of the location of the KRAS-mutation.Methods: From 10/2009 till 12/2011 we diagnosed 497 patients with non-sqamous NSCLC stage IIIB and IV. KRAS mutation analysis was performed via LightCycler Real-time PCR.Results: A mutation analysis could be completed in 299/497 tissue samples (206 adenocarcinoma (AC) and 93 other non squamous carcinoma). In all other cases the amount of material was not sufficient for this addition analysis. In 76/299 cases (25.4%) a KRAS mutation was detected (30 male, 46 female). In 65/76 (85.5%) cases it was located in codon 12 and in 11/76 (14.5%) on codon 13. No significant difference in overall survival could be proofed for patients with mutations in KRAS codon 12 (median OS 278 days, 176-380 95%CI) versus patients with mutations in KRAS codon 13 (median OS 226 days, 27-429 95%CI; p=0.533).Conclusions: In our monocentric study population with advanced NSCLC the frequency of KRAS mutations in codon 12 and 13 is comparable to other studies. We did not find a prognostic relevance of the mutated gene´s location.


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
C. Boch, J. Kollmeier, A. Roth, D. Misch, T. Weiß, A. Streubel, T. Mairinger, T. T. Bauer (Berlin, Germany). The prognostic value of KRAS mutation according to the gene's. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: Suppl. 58, 511

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Prognostic value of EGFR mutation in NSCLC in surgical stage
Source: International Congress 2014 – Biology and pathology of thoracic tumours
Year: 2014

The value of miR221 and miR222 as a biomarker in non small cell lung cancer
Source: International Congress 2014 – Pathology and prognostic factors of thoracic tumours
Year: 2014

Serum IL-33 as a diagnostic and prognostic marker in non- small cell lung cancer
Source: International Congress 2014 – Pathology and prognostic factors of thoracic tumours
Year: 2014

Gene expression of EGFR, MINA53,MEN1 and MTOR in NSCLCs
Source: International Congress 2014 – Biology and pathology of thoracic tumours
Year: 2014


Methilation status in EBUS-NA samples of lung cancer
Source: International Congress 2014 – Improving diagnosis of thoracic tumours
Year: 2014

Integrative analysis of DNA copy number in metastatic NSCLC identifies drug sensitivity to Afatinib
Source: International Congress 2014 – Pathology and prognostic factors of thoracic tumours
Year: 2014

Polymorphism of HLA-G gene promotor in patients with non small cell lung cancer
Source: International Congress 2014 – Biology and pathology of thoracic tumours
Year: 2014

Comorbitities, responses and survival in pts with NSCLC
Source: International Congress 2014 – Epidemiology, pathogenesis and quality management of thoracic tumours
Year: 2014

Differences in expression and prognostic values of p16(ink) and VEGF in squamous and adenocarcinoma of the lung
Source: International Congress 2014 – Pathology and prognostic factors of thoracic tumours
Year: 2014


Metabolomic analysis of serum samples from patients with lung cancer
Source: International Congress 2014 – Biology and pathology of thoracic tumours
Year: 2014


The significance of HSP90AA1, HSP90AB1 and HSP90B1 gene polymorphisms in a Turkish population with non-small cell lung cancer
Source: International Congress 2014 – Biology and pathology of thoracic tumours
Year: 2014

Metabolic signatures associated with lung cancer using serum samples. Influence of hemolysis
Source: International Congress 2014 – Biology and pathology of thoracic tumours
Year: 2014


Prognostic value of survivin gene promoter polymorphisms in non-small cell lung cancer
Source: International Congress 2016 – Prognostic variables in lung cancer I
Year: 2016

Lung cancer after lymphoma: Disease characteristics, detection methods and clinical outcome
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Other thoracic tumours, particular circumstances and rare cases
Year: 2013

Relationship between risk factors for lung cancer and tumor size
Source: International Congress 2014 – Therapy of thoracic tumours: clinical trials and case series
Year: 2014


Frequency and type of EGFR mutations in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Prognostic factors and subtyping of lung cancer
Year: 2013


EGFR mutation diagnostic program for NSCLC patients in Poland between 2011-2014
Source: International Congress 2015 – Promising novel findings in translational pulmonary research
Year: 2015

Clinical characteristics of 32 patients with BRAF V600E-mutated lung adenocarcinoma
Source: International Congress 2015 – Advances in the therapy of lung cancer
Year: 2015


Second primary lung cancer in squamous NSCLC patients: The Nancy Biobank's database
Source: International Congress 2014 – Epidemiology, pathogenesis and quality management of thoracic tumours
Year: 2014

Symptom-to-treatment intervals in lung cancer
Source: International Congress 2014 – Therapy of thoracic tumours: clinical trials and case series
Year: 2014