Asthma treatment preference study – a conjoint analysis

G. Johanssen, B. Ställberg, G. Tornling, S. Andersson, K Fält, F. Berggren (Uppsala, Trosa, Lund, Södertälje, Stockholm, Sweden)

Source: Annual Congress 2002 - Asthma - Therapy and management -2
Session: Asthma - Therapy and management -2
Session type: Thematic Poster Session
Number: 401
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstract

Abstract

To assess patient preferences for attributes of asthma treatments. Two hundred and ninety-eight patients, aged 18–60, from 15 centres in Sweden completed a questionnaire concerning their asthma and ranked 18 alternative treatments using conjoint analysis. Patients were treated with either inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and short acting bronchodilator alone (42%) or ICS and long acting bronchodilator (58%). Attributes analysed were: maintenance treatment, additional reliever, time to onset and duration of reliever, number of symptom-free days (SFD) per month, and out-of-pocket cost per month. According to conjoint data the most important aspect of treatment was SFD. 40% of the patients had 15 or less SFD per month. 85% of the patients preferred another treatment than their current treatment, and the patients was prepared to pay approximately SEK 300 (€ 33) per month for the change. Treatment preferences were heterogeneous and in 78% not covered by current treatment guidelines. Overall, patients preferred a combination inhaler (50%) to separate inhalers, and a reliever that is both rapid- and long-acting (78%). Most preferred treatment was a combination inhaler for maintenance and reliever use (28%). Symptom-free days were most important. Patients favoured treatment with a combination inhaler and reliever therapy that was both rapid- and long-acting.


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
G. Johanssen, B. Ställberg, G. Tornling, S. Andersson, K Fält, F. Berggren (Uppsala, Trosa, Lund, Södertälje, Stockholm, Sweden). Asthma treatment preference study – a conjoint analysis. Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 401

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Effect of not appropriate treatment in severe/not controlled asthma: The AGAVE study
Source: International Congress 2015 – Treatment and control of respiratory disease
Year: 2015

Patient preferences for asthma management: a qualitative study
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Advances in asthma treatment
Year: 2020


Asthma control: a qualitative study of patients‘ experiences
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 671s
Year: 2005

REG study: Real-life, longitudinal ICS adherence patterns in a UK asthma population
Source: International Congress 2015 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2015


The control of asthma in real life: Baseline evaluation of a long-term study
Source: International Congress 2016 – Monitoring airway diseases with clinical tools
Year: 2016

Cluster analysis on longitudinal data of patients with adult-onset asthma
Source: International Congress 2016 – Asthma: from basic mechanisms to novel therapeutic perspectives
Year: 2016


Clinical and demographic characteristics of Seinäjoki adult asthma study (SAAS)
Source: International Congress 2015 – Clinical assessment and monitoring of asthma and COPD
Year: 2015


Prescription patterns and treatment adherence of asthma controller therapy in children in a Dutch primary care database
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Paediatric respiratory epidemiology: bronchiolitis and asthma
Year: 2013


Multivariate cluster analysis of immunopathological and clinical data from the U-BIOPRED severe asthma study: Preliminary results
Source: International Congress 2015 – New insights into lung disease pathogenesis
Year: 2015

Identification and validation of asthma phenotypes in Chinese population using cluster analysis
Source: International Congress 2015 – Is asthma always an easy disease to diagnose and manage?
Year: 2015


Asthma treatment impacts time to pregnancy: evidence from the international SCOPE study
Source: Eur Respir J, 51 (2) 1702035; 10.1183/13993003.02035-2017
Year: 2018



Asthma Control Questionnaire in children: validation, measurement properties, interpretation
Source: Eur Respir J 2010; 36: 1410-1416
Year: 2010



Assessment of asthma control based on French guidelines criteria. Results from a pharmacy-based study
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 684s
Year: 2006

Automated video analysis of movements in learning the inhaled administration of drugs by patients: A validation study
Source: International Congress 2016 – Abstracts in medical education, the web and the internet
Year: 2016


A national database study of the effectiveness of switching real-life asthma patients to fostair
Source: International Congress 2015 – New data on established treatments for asthma, COPD and bronchiectasis
Year: 2015


Asthma severity, poor control, co-morbidities and prior resource use determined omalizumab prescriptions in a nested case-control study with US claims data
Source: International Congress 2015 – Clincal aspects of asthma: monitoring and mechanisms
Year: 2015


Medication use in children with asthma: a case control study
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 329s
Year: 2001

ADEPT, airway disease endotyping for personalized treatment: Interim analysis of asthma patients
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Novel drugs and biomarkers in respiratory medicine
Year: 2013

Work related symptoms of adult patients with asthma: A multicenter, national, questionnaire based study
Source: International Congress 2015 – Work, environment and the epidemiology of asthma
Year: 2015

Asthma and job selection: an international population-based analysis
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Epidemiology of asthma and allergy
Year: 2008