Domiciliary nebuliser treatment: How should we assess the response to treatment?

R. Carter, J. Stenhouse, A. Oliver, S. W. Banham (Glasgow, United Kingdom)

Source: Annual Congress 2003 - Assessing airway function: practicalities and clinical applications
Session: Assessing airway function: practicalities and clinical applications
Session type: Oral Presentation
Number: 3622
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstractSlide presentation

Abstract

The assessment for suitability for this treatment usually rely upon the response to lung function tests. There is usually little emphasis on the patient’s own view of this form of treatment. The responses to treatment of patients being assessed for long term nebuliser therapy were identified using simple spirometry and a COPD Symptom and the LCADL questionnaire. Spirometry was performed prior to assessment and acutely following nebuliser administration and at review following 6 weeks of therapy. Questionnaires were reported prior to and following a six week course of therapy. 30 patients with COPD were assessed for nebuliser therapy. The mean FEV1 was 0.89 Litres (0.311) with a mean FVC of 2.15 (0.74) Litres. Only 5 patients showed a significant response to acute nebuliser administration according to the BTS COPD guidelines. There was a significant decrease in the symptoms associated with COPD during the nebuliser trail period (Cumulative symptom score prior to therapy 47.4 (6.4), nebuliser trial 34.3 (9.5); p<-0.001). In addition there was a reduction in the degree of breathlessness caused by daily activities from a score of 49.3 (8.3) to 35.9 (7.3), p<0.001). There was no relationship between decreasing COPD symptom scores and any increase in FEV1 (correlation coefficient –0.138) or FVC (correlation coefficient 0.045). These results suggest that patients with COPD show an improvement in their symptoms with nebuliser therapy despite the absence of a significant change in FEV1 or FVC.


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
R. Carter, J. Stenhouse, A. Oliver, S. W. Banham (Glasgow, United Kingdom). Domiciliary nebuliser treatment: How should we assess the response to treatment?. Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 3622

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Domiciliary nebuliser treatment: Do we follow the guidelines?
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 147s
Year: 2003

Optimising bronchodilator therapy in COPD: Who, why and when?
Source: International Congress 2019 – Personalised medicine in COPD: Matching the patient needs with the right care
Year: 2019

Real-world effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of asthma step-up options: A UK comparison of extrafine hydrofluoroalkane-beclometasone and combination therapy
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Treatment and management of asthma in primary care
Year: 2013


Organising your asthma clinic: how to optimise adherence to maintenance therapy
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Improving adherence to maintenance medication in asthma: new tools for the clinician
Year: 2012


Improving symptomology in COPD: which therapy would you choose, a brochodilator or pulmonary rehabilitation?
Source: International Congress 2019 – Hot topics in pulmonary rehabilitation
Year: 2019


Adherence to asthma treatment: Can it be improved in general practice?
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Inflammation in airway diseases: diagnosis and management
Year: 2012

The effectiveness of nebulizer therapy in the treatment of patients with bronchial asthma
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 424s
Year: 2001

GENebu Project: home nebulizer use and maintenance in Italy
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: 758-763
Year: 2001



Monitoring adherence to treatment regimen of inhaled medication use in a clinical trial with an investigational eFlow nebulizer (eTrack)
Source: International Congress 2017 – Medical education, web and internet
Year: 2017


In whom should regular asthma controller therapy be initiated?
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Treatment and management of asthma in primary care
Year: 2013


Inhaler preference comparing two alternative dual bronchodilator regimens
Source: International Congress 2016 – Pulmonary drug delivery
Year: 2016


Does CPAP use reflect effective CPAP treatment?
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 562s
Year: 2002

What the pulmonary specialist should know about the new inhalation therapies
Source: Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 1308-1417
Year: 2011



Combination therapy versus separate therapy in real-life primary care asthma patients
Source: International Congress 2015 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2015