Comparison of airway resistance measured with three different techniques

K. van der Velden-van Etten, K. Nietzman-Lammering, R. Hoek, P. Zanen, H. Stam (Rotterdam, Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Source: Annual Congress 2003 - Assessing airway function: practicalities and clinical applications
Session: Assessing airway function: practicalities and clinical applications
Session type: Oral Presentation
Number: 3621
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstractSlide presentation

Abstract

Introduction: In our pulmonary function laboratory we are able to measure airway resistance with bodyplethysmography, impulsoscillometry and the interruptor technique. In this study we compared these methods and we estimated predicted values.
Method: In 73 healthy adults (aged 18-78 years) we compared Reff, Rtot, R0,5, R20Hz, R5Hz and Rint. We performed the measurements in one session and in a random order.
Results: The various R values were significantly different, p-values variated from 0.000 to 0.027. Rtot, Reff and R0,5 correlated well (correlation between 0.72 and 0.97). Rtot correlated well with R20Hz, R5Hz and Rint (correlation 0.63 and 0.82), but the correlation between Reff and R0,5 with R20Hz, R5Hz and Rint respectively was moderate (correlation between 0.48 and 0.55). The variability of all variables appeared to be comparable. The resistances were not significanly dependent on age and height. Therefore, we estimated means and standard deviations for all the variables mentioned above. We found Reff = 0.15 ± 0.06 (SD) kPa.l-1.s, Rtot = 0.19 ± 0.07 (SD) kPa.l-1.s, R0,5 = 0.13 ± 0.05 (SD) kPa.l-1.s, R20Hz = 0.26 ± 0.09 (SD) kPa.l-1.s, R5Hz = 0.30 ± 0.10 (SD) kPa.l-1.s and Rint = 0.24 ± 0.08 (SD) kPa.l-1.s.
Conclusions: Because of the moderate correlation we concluded that the various parameters don‘t describe the same mechanism. In further research we will study which parameter is separating best healthy from disease.


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
K. van der Velden-van Etten, K. Nietzman-Lammering, R. Hoek, P. Zanen, H. Stam (Rotterdam, Utrecht, The Netherlands). Comparison of airway resistance measured with three different techniques. Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 3621

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Comparison of two different oscillatory techniques for the non-invasive measurement of respiratory system resistance (Rrs) in the horse
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 97s
Year: 2003

Comparison of different measurement methods of gas diffusion in the lung
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Pathophysiological mechanisms in disease: new insights
Year: 2012

Agreement of airway resistance measurements by two different techniques of body-plethysmography and impulse oscillometry in asthmatic patients
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Lung function today and tomorrow I
Year: 2011

The interrupter resistance measured with 2 systems; a comparison
Source: Eur Respir J 2007; 30: Suppl. 51, 177s
Year: 2007

Measurement of airway resistence by interrupter technique as a part of lung diagnostics in the working ability assessment
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 304s
Year: 2003

Bronchial provocation in children assessed by spirometry and airway resistance using interrupter technique: Comparison of two methods
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Airways and lung mechanics in subjects of all ages
Year: 2010


Analysis of the airway transcriptome in two rat strains of differing airway responsiveness
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Recent developments of molecular pathology and functional genomics in chronic and acute airway diseases
Year: 2010

Variability of lung function parameters due to use of different spirometers
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 516s
Year: 2002

Comparison of 2 autoCPAP algorithms: apnoea-hypopnea-flow limitation versus airway impedance
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 94s
Year: 2003

Comparison of three different methods of FeNO measurement in children
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Crossroads between paediatric respiratory physiology and epidemiology
Year: 2007


Changes in airway dead space related to airway resistance at different transpulmonary pressures
Source: Annual Congress 2004 - Clinical physiology: airways and vessels
Year: 2004


Comparison of FEV1 and specific airway conductance in assessing bronchial response to occupational agents
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 488s
Year: 2003

Can airway resistance, measured by the interrupter technique, be useful in evaluating the methacholine bronchial challenge test in children?
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 585s
Year: 2004

Comparison of spirometric indices measured by thermoanemometric and screen type pneumotach
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 203s
Year: 2001

Comparison of predicted lung function values estimating height from alternative methods
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Beyond spirometry: the skills behind lung function testing
Year: 2008

Airway resistance measured by the interrupter technique: expiration or inspiration, mean or median?
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 17: 495-498
Year: 2001



Comparison between maximal inspiratory pressures measured by unidirectional valve method and conventional method in healthy subjects without artificial airway
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - New insights in the physical assessment and therapy of respiratory patients
Year: 2012