A comparison of the response to inhaled histamine measured with FEV1 and sGaw in healthy subjects

R. Lunde, H. Bindels, J. A. van Noord (Heerlen, The Netherlands)

Source: Annual Congress 2003 - Assessing airway function: practicalities and clinical applications
Session: Assessing airway function: practicalities and clinical applications
Session type: Oral Presentation
Number: 3617
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstractSlide presentation

Abstract

In bronchial challenge tests specific airway conductance ( sGaw ) is a more sensitive index of change in airways calibre than forced expiratory volume in 1 second ( FEV1 ). The purpose of the present study was to compare the specificity of the change in sGaw and FEV1 in bronchial challenge tests with histamine.
Methods: In 23 healthy subjects ( 13 males, 10 females ) a bronchial challenge test was performed ( doubling doses of histamine administered for 2 min. at 5-min. interval, 0.13 ml/ min. jet-nebulizer output. Subjects and their first degree relatives had to have no history of respiratory symptoms and allergy. Subjects had to have normal lung function, no medication and never been smoking. Response was measured first by sGaw, secondly by FEV1.
Results: In baseline conditions mean FEV1 ( ± SD ) was 4.2 ± 0.8 l. ( 104 % ± 13 % pred. ) and mean sGaw 2.94 ± 0.80 s-1.kPa-1. The PC20FEV1 was > 8 mg/ ml. in 18 subjects and ranged from 3.4 to 8 mg/ ml. in 5 subjects; PC40sGaw was > 8 mg/ ml. in 5 subjects and ranging from 0.01 to 8 mg/ ml. in 18 subjects. In the group of 18 subjects with PC20FEV1 > 8 mg/ ml. mean increase in sGaw at 8 mg/ ml. was 50 % (range from - 18 % to + 94 % ). Using a cutoff value of 8 mg/ ml. specificity was 78 % for PC20FEV1 and 22 % for PC40sGaw. Selection of lower cut-off values for PC40sGaw did not improve specificity to a satifactory level.
Conclusion: In healthy subjects PC40sGaw, in contrast to PC20FEV1, showed a very wide range of values. As a consequence in clinical bronchial responsiveness testing PC40sGaw lacks specificity to distinguish between healthy subjects and asthmatics.


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
R. Lunde, H. Bindels, J. A. van Noord (Heerlen, The Netherlands). A comparison of the response to inhaled histamine measured with FEV1 and sGaw in healthy subjects. Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 3617

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Comparison of sensitivity and variability of sGaw and FEV1 for measuring bronchodilation in healthy and asthmatic subjects
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 338s
Year: 2004

Effects of inhaled histamine and methacholine on the lung function parameters obtained by spirometry and forced oscillations in asthmatic children
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Lung function from infancy to adulthood
Year: 2010


sGaw as an alternative for FEV1 in the measurement of airway responsiveness to methacholine in patients experiencing chronic cough
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Lung function today and tomorrow I
Year: 2011


The influence of FVC manoeuvres on consecutive FEV1 values during methacholine challenge
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 587s
Year: 2004

Tachyphylaxis to methacholine changes the dose-response curve in healthy non-asthmatic subjects
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 442s
Year: 2004

Maximally attained level of FEV1 and FEV1 decline determine airway hyperresponsiveness in adults
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 17s
Year: 2003

FEV1 bronchodilatation response in a population sample and healthy adults
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 202s
Year: 2006

Post-exercise changes in FEV1 values and in adenosine concentrations in exhaled-breath condensate in healthy subjects and patients with exercise-induced asthma
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 290s
Year: 2002

Should bronchodilator response be assessed in all asthmatic children with normal baseline spirometry?
Source: International Congress 2018 – New ideas about respiratory and sleep physiology in children
Year: 2018



Comparison of FEV1 and PEF values in cough variant asthma during methacholine challenge test
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Cough, airway hyperresponsiveness and asthma control
Year: 2010


PD40 sGaw with deep inhalation as alternative for PD20 FEV1
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical characteristics and diagnostic tools for phenotyping asthma and COPD
Year: 2020

FEV1 response to albuterol is not affected by inhaled human insulin (Exubera®) use in subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 840s
Year: 2006

Comparison of bronchodilatator response of FEV1 and airway resistance
Source: Annual Congress 2003 - Assessing airway function: practicalities and clinical applications
Year: 2003


Baseline FEV1and sputum neutrophils and macrophages predict the decrease in FEV1 after inhaled corticosteroid withdrawal in COPD
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 306s
Year: 2004

Respiratory impedance in healthy subjects: baseline values and bronchodilator response
Source: Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 1513-1523
Year: 2013



FEV1 and respiratory resistance response to methacholine in children calculated from between-measurement variability
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 43s
Year: 2005

Airway responsiveness to methacholine and deep inhalations in obese subjects
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Lung function in respiratory disease
Year: 2008

IsovolumeFEF25-75%6 and FEV1 for identifying bronchodilator response
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 156s
Year: 2006

Relationship between bronchodilator response measured by FEV0.5 and methacholine provocation test in children from 3 to 15 years old
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Paediatric lung function, imaging and methodology in health and disease
Year: 2009

Evaluation of the response of airway obstruction to short-acting inhaled broncodilators with using FIV1 and FEV1 in COPD patients
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 290s
Year: 2005