Comparison of biological and nonbiological quality control methods for assessing interlaboratory differences in TLCO and VA measurements Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 145s Year: 2003
What’s new in spirometry biological quality control Source: International Congress 2019 – New insights into quality control of lung function testing Year: 2019
Novel strategies for quality control of forced spirometry Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Quality control in lung function and exercise-related issues Year: 2011
Recommended approaches to minimize aerosol dispersion of COVID during noninvasive ventilatory support can deteriorate ventilator performances: a benchmark comparative study Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – New trends in non-invasive respiratory support Year: 2021
Direct comparison of two auto-CPAP devices using different flow-limitation based algorithms Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 111s Year: 2005
The results of the modelling of respiratory muscles strength proper values by means of artificial intelligence methods Source: International Congress 2018 – Respiratory physiology and measurements Year: 2018
Comparison of different measurement methods of gas diffusion in the lung Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Pathophysiological mechanisms in disease: new insights Year: 2012
Quality control of DL,CO instruments in global clinical trials Source: Eur Respir J 2009; 33: 828-834 Year: 2009
Validation of exercise testing with supplemental oxygen through biological quality control Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Quality measurement and improvement in lung function Year: 2010
Of the need to reconcile discrepancies between two different reference equations for combined single-breath D LNO –D LCO in systemic sclerosis Source: Eur Respir J, 53 (4) 1802109; 10.1183/13993003.02109-2018 Year: 2019
Efficiency of different strategies of asthma control achievement in real clinical practice Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Asthma: control and treatment Year: 2011
Technical problems with functional measurements: instruments, parameters, standardization of the methods, reference values Source: ERS Skills course - Biomarkers and functional assessment of obstructive lung diseases Year: 2017
Spirometry quality control - documentation of random variability Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 380s Year: 2002
The limitations of quantitative measures: assessing approaches to research into NIV use in MND Source: Annual Congress 2009 - New trends in noninvasive ventilation for chronic respiratory failure Year: 2009
DLCO biological controls in clinical practice. Source: International Congress 2019 – Quality, performance and interpretation of lung function testing Year: 2019
Comparison of different analysis algorithms to calculate multiple-breath washout outcomes Source: ERJ Open Res, 4 (3) 00021-2017; 10.1183/23120541.00021-2017 Year: 2018
Current clinical methods of measurement of respiratory rate give imprecise values Source: ERJ Open Res, 6 (3) 00023-2020; 10.1183/23120541.00023-2020 Year: 2020
Assessment of diffusion capacity (TLCO) by the rebreathing method in healthy young children: preliminary results Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 224s Year: 2002
Should diffusing capacity quality control be treated like other laboratory devices? Source: Eur Respir J, 58 (6) 2102642; 10.1183/13993003.02642-2021 Year: 2021
Developing a new ultrasonic method to assess diaphragm movement and comparing the accuracy with existing methods. Source: International Congress 2017 – Respiratory muscles: evaluation and pathophysiology Year: 2017