Bronchodilatation, lung recoil, and density dependence of maximal expiratory flow. New interpretation of old data

O. F. Pedersen (Aarhus, Denmark)

Source: Annual Congress 2003 - Respiratory structure and mechanisms: current concepts
Session: Respiratory structure and mechanisms: current concepts
Session type: Oral Presentation
Number: 160

Congress or journal article abstract

Abstract

Aim: To reinterpret measurements by Weiss et al. (JAP 52:874-878,1982) of maximum expiratory flows (V’max) and static lung elastic recoil pressure (Pel) before and after bronchodilatation in 6 healthy subjects breathing air and 80% He in oxygen (He/O2).
Methods: From maximum flow-static recoil (MFSR) curves on air and He/O2, a MFSR curve for "frictionless" flow was derived under the assumption of laminar flow upstream to the choke point (CP). The cross-sectional area (A) and airway compliance (Caw) at CP, was calculated from the derived MFSR-curve by use of the "inverse" wave speed flow equation (Pedersen et al. JAP 52:357-369,1982). Furthermore the resistance of the airway upstream to CP was calculated as the horizontal distance between the derived MFSR curve and the curve for air.

Table 1: Model input
Before bronchodilationAfter bronchodilaion
%FVCPel (kPa)V‘max(air) (L/s)V‘max(He) L/s)Pel (kPa)V‘max(air) (L/s)V‘max (He) (L/s)
50%0.8605.398.620.8606.1910.3
25%0.5363.635.380.5363.956.37


Results

Table 2: Model output
Before bronchodilatationAfter bronchodilatation
%FVCA (cm2)Caw (cm2/kPa)Rfr (kPa/(L/s))A (cm2)Caw (cm2 /kPa)Rfr (kPa/(L/s))
50%1.601.310.0162.022.080.004
25%1.321.600.0431.642.600.011


Conclusion: .The original paper concluded by indirect assessment that upstream frictional pressure loss was decreased by bronchodilatation. In addition to that conclusion the present model indicates that bronchodilation also increases airway area and airway compliance at CP, which intuitively seems correct.


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
O. F. Pedersen (Aarhus, Denmark). Bronchodilatation, lung recoil, and density dependence of maximal expiratory flow. New interpretation of old data. Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 160

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Recording flow in the first second of a maximal forced expiratory manoeuvre: influence of frequency content
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 19: 530-533
Year: 2002



Grain workers; relationship between serial peak expiratory flow measurements, symptoms and lung function
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 392s
Year: 2002

Regional expiratory flow limitation during spontaneous breathing: comparison of overall and regional lung function
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 94s
Year: 2001

Physiological techniques for detecting expiratory flow limitation during tidal breathing
Source: Eur Respir Rev 2011; 20: 147-155
Year: 2011



Exercise test results and forced expiratory flow rates at low lung volumes
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 286s
Year: 2002

Bronchodilatation and natural variation in maximal in-and expiratory flow volume curves in patients with stable COPD
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 539s
Year: 2002

Volume acceleration profile in expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 480s
Year: 2001

Breathing pattern and gas exchange at peak exercise in COPD patients with and without tidal flow limitation at rest
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 17: 1120-1127
Year: 2001



Influence of postural pattern during nebulization using broncodilators drugs on the maximal inspiratory pressure(MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) in asmathic children
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 407s
Year: 2004

Reference values for peak flow and FEV1 variation in healthy schoolchildren using home spirometry
Source: Eur Respir J 2008; 32: 1262-1268
Year: 2008



Peak expiratory flow value and relationships between functional parameters in COPD
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 808s
Year: 2006

Effect of peak expiratory flow data quantity on diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in occupational asthma
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 23: 730-734
Year: 2004



Lung function measurement in respiratory diseases: mechanisms
Source: Annual Congress 2006 - PG5 - Respiratory physiology: interpreting lung function in health and disease
Year: 2006



Validation of the assessment of flow limitation at rest by overlapping of the tidal and maximal flow volume curves
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Quality control in lung function and new developments
Year: 2009


Peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurement: a new approach
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Lung function, airways and cough
Year: 2008

Physiological effects of vibration in subjects with cystic fibrosis
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 1204-1209
Year: 2006



Peak in- and expiratory flow rates: reproducibility and reference values in adults
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Advances in lung function testing
Year: 2020


Assessment of a new airway clearance technology on maximal slow expiratory volume.
Source: International Congress 2019 – Role of the physiotherapist for patients with lung disease
Year: 2019

New concepts for expressing forced expiratory volume in 1 s arising from survival analysis
Source: Eur Respir J 2010; 35: 873-882
Year: 2010



Forced expiratory flows’ contribution to lung function interpretation in schoolchildren
Source: Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 107-115
Year: 2015