Cost-effectiveness of adding budesonide/formoterol to tiotropium in severe COPD patients in four Nordic countries

R. Nielsen, H. Kankaanranta, L. Bjermer, P. Lange, S. Arnetorp, M. Hedegaard, A. Stenling, N. Mittmann (Bergen, Norway; Seinäjoki, Finland; Lund, Mölndal, Södertälje, Sweden; Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark)

Source: Annual Congress 2012 - COPD treatments: efficacy and safety
Session: COPD treatments: efficacy and safety
Session type: Thematic Poster Session
Number: 2106
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstract

Abstract

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol (B/F)+tiotropium (TIO) versus placebo (PBO)+TIO for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients eligible for inhaled corticosteroid/ long-acting β2-agonist from societal and healthcare perspectives in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.
Method: The cost-effectiveness analysis was based on the 12-week, randomised, double-blind CLIMB trial (NCT00496470) of 659 COPD patients with pre-bronchodilator FEV1 ≤50%, and at least one severe exacerbation (hospitalisation, emergency room visit or systemic glucocorticosteroids) the preceding year. Subjects were treated with B/F 320/9µg bid+TIO 18µg qd or PBO bid+TIO 18µg qd. Effectiveness was defined as the number of exacerbations avoided. A sub-analysis included antibiotics in the definition of an exacerbation. Resource use from the trial was combined with 2010 Danish (DKK), Finnish (€), Norwegian (NOK) and Swedish (SEK) unit costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated by bootstrapping.
Results: From a societal perspective, the ICER was estimated at €174 per exacerbation avoided (pEA) in Finland while B/F+TIO was dominant in the other countries. From a healthcare perspective, B/F+TIO was dominant in Norway and the ICERs were estimated at DKK 1,580 (€212), €307, SEK 1,573 (€165) pEA for Denmark, Finland and Sweden, respectively. Including antibiotics decreased ICERs by 8-15%. Sensitivity analyses showed that results were overall robust.
Conclusion: The results indicate that B/F+TIO represents a clinical and economic benefit to health systems and society for the treatment of COPD in the Nordic countries.


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
R. Nielsen, H. Kankaanranta, L. Bjermer, P. Lange, S. Arnetorp, M. Hedegaard, A. Stenling, N. Mittmann (Bergen, Norway; Seinäjoki, Finland; Lund, Mölndal, Södertälje, Sweden; Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark). Cost-effectiveness of adding budesonide/formoterol to tiotropium in severe COPD patients in four Nordic countries. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: Suppl. 56, 2106

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Cost-effectiveness of tiotropium versus glycopyrronium in moderate to very severe COPD in France
Source: International Congress 2017 – Does economisation of medicine transfer into benefits for patients?
Year: 2017


Efficacy of tiotropium and olodaterol fixed-dose combination in patients with COPD on β-blockers
Source: International Congress 2015 – Safety of and interactions between current treatments for asthma and COPD
Year: 2015


Safety of tiotropium and olodaterol fixed-dose combination for COPD in patients on β-blockers
Source: International Congress 2015 – New data on established treatments for COPD
Year: 2015


Economic evaluation of beclomethasone/formoterol versus budesonide/formoterol in the treatment of patient with moderate-severe asthma in Spain
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Impact of patient education on cost-effectiveness of treatment
Year: 2008


Overall and cardiovascular safety of aclidinium/formoterol fixed-dose combination versus salmeterol/fluticasone in patients with COPD
Source: International Congress 2015 – Safety of and interactions between current treatments for asthma and COPD
Year: 2015


Budesonide/formoterol added to tiotropium improves exacerbations and exacerbation-related antibiotic use in patients with COPD
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Drug effects in COPD
Year: 2009

Cost-effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol added to tiotropium in COPD patients in Canada, Australia and Sweden
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Does cost-effectiveness go together with best quality of treatment? New drivers in medicine
Year: 2010

Once-daily QVA149 reduces exacerbations and improves health status in comparison with glycopyrronium and tiotropium in patients with severe-to-very severe COPD: The SPARK study
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Clinical trials of LAMAs, LABAs, MABAs and theophylline for asthma and COPD
Year: 2013


Assessment of efficacy and tolerability of roflumilast add-on to LABA/LAMA/ICS in the treatment of COPD in Indian patients
Source: International Congress 2016 – Novel avenues in the treatment of COPD I
Year: 2016


QVA149 is more efficacious than tiotropium and salmeterol/fluticasone combination (SFC) in improving patient-reported outcomes and lung function in COPD patients with moderate-to-severe baseline dyspnoea: The IGNITE trials
Source: International Congress 2015 – New data on established treatments for asthma, COPD and bronchiectasis
Year: 2015

Efficacy of aclidinium/formoterol fixed-dose combination versus salmeterol/fluticasone in COPD
Source: International Congress 2015 – New data on established treatments for asthma, COPD and bronchiectasis
Year: 2015


A new budesonide/formoterol inhalation therapy in patients with asthma, COPD and ACOS
Source: International Congress 2017 – Bronchial asthma management
Year: 2017

Association of β2-adrenoreceptor genotypes with prevention of COPD exacerbations by tiotropium or salmeterol in the POET-COPD® trial
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Trials in COPD: novel treatments and insights
Year: 2012


Dual bronchodilation with once-daily QVA149 reduces exacerbations, improves lung function and health status versus glycopyrronium and tiotropium in severe-to-very severe COPD patients: The SPARK study
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –New bronchodilators for COPD management
Year: 2013

Benefit of budesonide/formoterol compared with salmeterol/fluticasone in COPD patients in the morning
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Healthcare and treatment of COPD
Year: 2009

Impact of adherence to treatment with tiotropium co-administered with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination in COPD patients
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Treatment and adherence to treatment of respiratory disease
Year: 2013

Comparison of cardiovascular safety in a pooled analysis of COPD trials comparing tiotropium with salmeterol
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Clinical trials of LAMAs, LABAs, MABAs and theophylline for asthma and COPD
Year: 2013


Comparison of spirometric efficacy of fluticasone/salmeterol plus tiotropium and tiotropium alone in moderate COPD
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - New bronchodilators
Year: 2009


Effectiveness of indacaterol and tiotropium in patients with severe dyspnoea
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - COPD treatments: efficacy and safety
Year: 2012


Improvement in health status in patients with moderate to severe COPD after treatment with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 250s
Year: 2002