e-learning
resources
Glasgow 2004
Tuesday 07.09.2004
Primary care: asthma, COPD and tuberculosis
Login
Search all ERS
e-learning
resources
Disease Areas
Airways Diseases
Interstitial Lung Diseases
Respiratory Critical Care
Respiratory Infections
Paediatric Respiratory Diseases
Pulmonary Vascular Diseases
Sleep and Breathing Disorders
Thoracic Oncology
Events
International Congress
Courses
Webinars
Conferences
Research Seminars
Journal Clubs
Publications
Breathe
Monograph
ERJ
ERJ Open Research
ERR
European Lung White Book
Handbook Series
Guidelines
All ERS guidelines
e-learning
CME Online
Case reports
Short Videos
SpirXpert
Procedure Videos
CME tests
Reference Database of Respiratory Sounds
Radiology Image Challenge
Brief tobacco interventions
EU Projects
VALUE-Dx
ERN-LUNG
ECRAID
UNITE4TB
Disease Areas
Events
Publications
Guidelines
e-learning
EU Projects
Login
Search
The usefulness of chosen spirometrical parameters in the interpretation of obstruction reversibility test
J. Klimiuk, K. Wrotek, R. Chazan (Warsaw, Poland)
Source:
Annual Congress 2004 - Primary care: asthma, COPD and tuberculosis
Session:
Primary care: asthma, COPD and tuberculosis
Session type:
Poster Discussion
Number:
2955
Disease area:
Airway diseases
Rating:
You must
login
to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
J. Klimiuk, K. Wrotek, R. Chazan (Warsaw, Poland). The usefulness of chosen spirometrical parameters in the interpretation of obstruction reversibility test. Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 2955
You must
login
to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
No comment yet.
You must
Login
to comment this presentation.
Related content which might interest you:
Expert interview: TB-Machine learning and artificial intelligence as allies in clinical decision
Late Breaking Abstract - Implications of treatable traits and treatment choices on exacerbation risk in moderate-severe asthma
Management of Severe Asthma in Pediatric Patients by an Interdisciplinary Team in a Public Hospital Setting.
Related content which might interest you:
Oscillatory resistances measurement is an useful and reliable test to assess bronchial obstruction and reversibility
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 575s
Year: 2004
Significance of the forced oscillation technique for evaluation of the bronchodilation test in patients with initial mild airway obstruction
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Unusual tools for evaluating obstructive diseases
Year: 2020
Comparison of usefulness of selected lung function tests in the diagnosis of exercise induced bronchoconstriction
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Clinical aspects of asthma and allergic respiratory diseases
Year: 2010
Better time management of a lung function laboratory by avoiding redundant ”routinely“ performed reversibility spirometry tests
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 147s
Year: 2003
Indication, interpretation and clinical utility of bronchoprovocation testing
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - New ATS/ERS recommendations for bronchoprovocation challenge testing
Year: 2012
The accuracy of mid expiratory flow and dysanapsis parameters for evaluation of methacholine provocation test
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Airway hyperresponsiveness: mechanism and assessment
Year: 2009
When to apply which bronchial challenge test and interpretation of the results
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –New ATS/ERS recommendations for bronchial challenge testing
Year: 2013
Interpretation of pulmonary function tests and preoperative assessment
Source: International Congress 2014 – PG03 Respiratory medicine: diagnosis to treatment from a mentor and junior perspective
Year: 2014
Diagnostic value of spirometric parameters in bronchial remodeling estimation in asthma
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 220s
Year: 2006
The TLNO/TLCO ratio in pulmonary function test interpretation
Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 311
Year: 2004
The TLNO/TLCO ratio in pulmonary function test interpretation
Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 310
Year: 2004
Value of the peakflowmeters for reversibility tests
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 84s
Year: 2004
Airway obstruction reversibility test in the assessment of COPD severity
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 57s
Year: 2005
Explaining predictions of an automated pulmonary function test interpretation algorithm
Source: International Congress 2019 – M-health/e-health I
Year: 2019
Relationships between bronchial obstruction and differential NO parameters after methacholine challenge testing
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Lung and airway function
Year: 2011
Bronchial challenge tests: usefulness, availability and limitations
Source: Breathe 2011; 8: 53-60
Year: 2011
Novel spirometry indices detect mild airflow obstruction not detected by traditional criteria
Source: International Congress 2018 – New predictors of morbidity and mortality in COPD
Year: 2018
The interpretation and discriminatory power of bronchodilator measurements: the influence of baseline lung function and disease type
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 276s
Year: 2003
Feasibility and reproducibility of pulmonary function tests in preschoolers
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Lung function today and tomorrow I
Year: 2011
Paediatric lung function tests reference values: appropriateness and interpretation
Source: International Congress 2015 – ME10 Paediatric lung function tests reference values
Year: 2015
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of the cookies.
Accept