Are the flow independent NO parameters flow dependent?

M. Högman, P. Meriläinen (Gävle, Uppsala, Sweden)

Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Role of the biomarkers in airway diseases
Session: Role of the biomarkers in airway diseases
Session type: Poster Discussion
Number: 4780
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstractE-poster

Abstract

Background
The interest in alveolar NO, one of the flow independent parameters, is increasing since it is elevated in severe and nocturnal asthma and in COPD. The nonlinear approach (Högman-Meriläinen Algorithm) with low, medium and high flow rates has been used to calculate CANO, DawNO and CawNO. The aim was to set how low and how high these flow rates should be.
Methods
Subjects (n=32), without classifications of disease, volunteered to exhale with eight flow rates between 10 and 350 mL/s. NO was measured by CLD 88sp NO analyzer (ECO Medics AG, Switzerland). The subjects were grouped according to low, normal and high FENO0.05. The correction for axial diffusion was applied (Condorelli et al. 2004).
Results
There was a significant difference (p=0.001) in CawNO and DawNO (p=0.001) with the use of 30 instead of 10 mL/s. The CANO values were significantly different with the use of 250 instead of 350 mL/s (p=0.001). The three groups had CANO of 0.9±0.2, 0.9±0.1 and 0.9±0.3 ppb respectively. With correction of axial diffusion the CANO became 0.3±0.2, -0.5±0.2 and -2.7±0.6 ppb with majority of values being negative.
Conclusion
The flow independent NO parameters are flow dependent. With the use of the nonlinear model with the HMA approach to calculate CANO, DawNO and CawNO the flow rates to be used use are 10, 100 and 350 for adults. Further studies have to be done in children that cannot perform these low and high flow rates. Most importantly, the axial diffusion correction is of limited value with the HMA method.
Abbreviation: HMA=Högman-Meriläinen algorithm, CANO= alveolar NO, CawNO=airway wall NO, DawNO=airway transfer factor of NO


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
M. Högman, P. Meriläinen (Gävle, Uppsala, Sweden). Are the flow independent NO parameters flow dependent?. Eur Respir J 2011; 38: Suppl. 55, 4780

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Validation of the assessment of flow limitation at rest by overlapping of the tidal and maximal flow volume curves
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Quality control in lung function and new developments
Year: 2009


A model-based analysis of the effect of hypoxia on regional pulmonary blood flow
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Physiology of human pulmonary hypertension
Year: 2011

Peak flow is not strictly comparable by gauge and spirometry in many patients
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Quality of diagnosis and assessment in primary care
Year: 2011


Kinetic parameters of muscle O2 extraction at the onset of exercise to assess blood flow to O2 uptake mismatch in disease populations
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Peripheral and respiratory muscles oxygen transport during exercise
Year: 2010

Improving the quality of serial peak flow measurements
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 281s
Year: 2001

Comparison of peak expiratory flow values between Cipla peak flow master and Wrights peak flow meter
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 221s
Year: 2006

An evaluation of peak expiratory flow measured on the smart peak flow meter
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Occupational exposure as a cause of respiratory disease
Year: 2020


Is there a need to perform both spirometry and flow volume loops?
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 147s
Year: 2003

New and old formula for predicting mean pulmonary artery pressure from doppler – assessed flow parameters in comparison with hemodynamic parameters
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 424s
Year: 2006

The effect of image plane location on MRI-based measurements of pulmonary blood flow distribution
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Parenchmya and bronchial carcinoma
Year: 2010



Reference values for lung mechanics studied with sinusoidal flow regulation
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 363s
Year: 2005

Reproducibility in parameters of forced inspiratory flow
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Functional insights into COPD
Year: 2009

The ideal gas solubility for the measurement of pulmonary blood flow from gas exchange
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 86s
Year: 2003

Blood flow cytometric analysis in stable asthmatics
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 589s
Year: 2005

Continuous measurement of peak expiratory flow – to whom and how long?
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Assessing asthma severity and control in children
Year: 2007


Impact of leakage on external flow measurement in non-invasive ventilation
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Recent technical developments in long-term noninvasive ventilation
Year: 2012



Measurement of lung volume and ventilation distribution with an ultrasonic flow meter in healthy infants
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: 912-918
Year: 2002



Assessment of portable oxygen concentrators to revert induced hypoxia by hypoxic challenge testing in paediatric patients. A comparative study between continuous flow and pulse flow delivery systems.
Source: International Congress 2019 – New developments in sleep-disordered breathing, gas exchange and lung function in children
Year: 2019

Variability of the peak inspiratory flow (PIF) measurement
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 204s
Year: 2001