Source: Annual Congress 2004 - Standardization of tests and equipment evaluation: from spirometry on wards
Disease area: Airway diseases, Paediatric lung diseases



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
E. Ruberg, A. F. J. Brouwer, R. J. Roorda, P. L. P. Brand (Zwolle, The Netherlands). The (un)importance of the time-interval between inhalation and FEV₁ measurement in a methacholine challenge test. Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 1164

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Comparison of FEV1 and PEF values in cough variant asthma during methacholine challenge test Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Cough, airway hyperresponsiveness and asthma control Year: 2010 The influence of FVC manoeuvres on consecutive FEV1 values during methacholine challenge Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 587s Year: 2004 FENO is not a substitute for the methacholine challenge test in children Source: International Congress 2018 – Paediatric asthma: new mechanisms and tools Year: 2018 The accuracy of mid expiratory flow and dysanapsis parameters for evaluation of methacholine provocation test Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Airway hyperresponsiveness: mechanism and assessment Year: 2009 Comparison of variations of FEV1 and forced oscillation technique during methacholine challenge Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 339s Year: 2004 Can the interrupter resistance be used to measure airway hyperresponsiveness during the methacholine challenge test as a substitute for FEV1? Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – New insights into lung function testing Year: 2021 Diagnostic performance of the weight-corrected methacholine bronchial challenge test in children Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 172s Year: 2002 PD40 sGaw with deep inhalation as alternative for PD20 FEV1 Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical characteristics and diagnostic tools for phenotyping asthma and COPD Year: 2020 Methacholine challenge testing with a single low methacholine concentration Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Airway hyperresponsiveness: mechanism and assessment Year: 2009 Validation of a single concentration inhalation provocation test (SCIPT) in children Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 540s Year: 2002 Assessment of airway responsiveness: Comparison of forced spirometry and body plethysmography for methacholine challenge tests Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Advances in lung function II Year: 2010 Impulse oscillometry (IOS) vs plethismographic methods to detect PD20 in the methacholine challenge test Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Lung and airway function Year: 2011 A comparison of the response to inhaled histamine measured with FEV1 and sGaw in healthy subjects Source: Annual Congress 2003 - Assessing airway function: practicalities and clinical applications Year: 2003 Particles in exhaled air before and after the methacholine challenge test Source: International Congress 2019 – Research and innovation in airway diseases Year: 2019 Relationship between bronchodilator response measured by FEV0.5 and methacholine provocation test in children from 3 to 15 years old Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Paediatric lung function, imaging and methodology in health and disease Year: 2009 FEV1 and respiratory resistance response to methacholine in children calculated from between-measurement variability Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 43s Year: 2005 Time of maximal spirometric change after bronchodilator inhalation Source: International Congress 2017 – Discussion of techniques and technologies in lung function Year: 2017 sGaw as an alternative for FEV1 in the measurement of airway responsiveness to methacholine in patients experiencing chronic cough Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Lung function today and tomorrow I Year: 2011 Comparison of exercise provocation and induced sputum measurement in patients with positive methacholine provocation test Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 371s Year: 2005