Diagnostic role of biology markers in 75 patients with pleural effusion

L. Pisani, A. Ricci, G. Gencarelli, L. Martone, P. Bruno, L. Tabbì, F. Fioretti, V. Pietrangeli, A. Proietti, S. Mariotta (Rome, Italy)

Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Novel approach in diagnosis and treatment of pleural effusions
Session: Novel approach in diagnosis and treatment of pleural effusions
Session type: E-Communication Session
Number: 225
Disease area: Respiratory infections, Thoracic oncology

Congress or journal article abstractE-poster

Abstract

Background: It is very important to discriminate quickly between malignant and non-malignant pleural effusion. Furthermore, even with the aid of routine invasive procedures, 10-20% of patients remain without diagnosis. The clinical significance of various biomarkers, measured in both serum and/or pleural fluids, is far to be demonstrated.
Aims: The aim of the study was to compare the serum and pleural fluid concentration of different biological markers in order to establish the inflammatory or malignant origin of pleural effusions
Methods: Seventy-five consecutive patients with pleural effusion were studied prospectively, 63 pts with pleural exudates (33 of inflammatory origin and 30 of malignant origin) and 12 pts with transudative effusions. In particular, c-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and neuronspecific enolase (NSE) were tested.
Results: Pleural fluid CRP levels were significantly higher in patients with inflammatory effusions compared to malignant (p< 0,05) or transudative effusion (p< 0,01). On the contrary, PCT was not found able to discriminate these patients. Pleural fluid CEA and NSE levels were significantly higher in patients with malignant effusions compared to inflammatory ones (p< 0,01).Using a cut- off point of 7,525 ng/ml, NSE presented 69,6% sensitivity and 84,6% specificity for the diagnosis of malignant vs inflammatory effusions.
Conclusions: we conclude that the measurement of the CRP, CEA and NSE levels at the onset of pleural effusion may provide useful information for the differential diagnosis in clinical practice


Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
L. Pisani, A. Ricci, G. Gencarelli, L. Martone, P. Bruno, L. Tabbì, F. Fioretti, V. Pietrangeli, A. Proietti, S. Mariotta (Rome, Italy). Diagnostic role of biology markers in 75 patients with pleural effusion. Eur Respir J 2010; 36: Suppl. 54, 225

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Diagnostic utility of biochemical parameters in patients with pleural effusions
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 386s
Year: 2001

Diagnostic usefulness of tumour markers in pleural effusions
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Diagnosis of pleural effusions and rare tumours experience
Year: 2009


The diagnostic role of pleural fluid and serum Pentraxin-3 levels in the determination of the etiology of pleural effusion
Source: International Congress 2017 – Best clinical practice for the management of chronic lung diseases
Year: 2017

The role of diagnostic thoracoscopy in patients with lung cancer and pleural effusion
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 542s
Year: 2003

Investigating unilateral pleural effusions: the role of cytology.
Source: International Congress 2018 – Mesothelioma and pleural malignancy: investigations and management
Year: 2018

The role of CTPA in investigating a patient with a pleural effusion of unknown etiology
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Clinical problems associated with cough, pleura and respiratory health status
Year: 2021

Diagnostic value of combined assays in differentiating tuberculous and malignant pleural effusions
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Genetics, immunology and microbiology of tuberculosis
Year: 2008


Investigating unilateral pleural effusions: the role of cytology
Source: Eur Respir J, 52 (5) 1801254; 10.1183/13993003.01254-2018
Year: 2018



Diagnostic and therapeuric utility of indigenous technique of pleuroscopy in patients of undiagnosed pleural effusions
Source: International Congress 2017 – Pleural interventions and transthoracic ultrasound (TUS)
Year: 2017

Diagnostic performance of novel and rapid tests for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusions
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Genetics, immunology and microbiology of tuberculosis
Year: 2008


Diagnostic approach to pleural effusions
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - MP7 - Diagnostic approach to pleural effusions
Year: 2008

Diagnostic of pleural effusion in HIV-positive patients
Source: International Congress 2019 – General thoracic surgery
Year: 2019


Diagnostic assessment in tuberculous pleural effusions
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 413s
Year: 2005

Utility of pleural fluid for predictive marker testing in malignant pleural effusion
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Malignant pleural effusion in 2020: understanding the biology and clinical implications
Year: 2020



Diagnostic thoracoscopy in patients with lung cancer and pleural effusion
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Pleural techniques and diagnosis of peripheral lung nodules
Year: 2007


The role of thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions (PE)
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 438s
Year: 2002

Diagnostic approach in a patient with pleural effusion
Source: ISSN=1025-448x, ISBN=1-904097-25-1, page=131
Year: 2002

Evaluation of patients with pleural effusions
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 247s
Year: 2004

Is the size of pleural effusion important in the study of patients whose first tumor manifestation is a pleural effusion?
Source: International Congress 2017 – Pleural and mediastinal malignancies
Year: 2017


Diagnostic implications of telomerase activity in pleural effusions
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: 422-426
Year: 2003