Variation among spirometry interpretation algorithms: Clinical implications

A. D‘Urzo, I. Tamari, J. Bouchard, R. Jhirad, D. Moosa, N. Paterson, P. Jugovic (Toronto, La Malbai, London, Canada)

Source: Annual Congress 2010 - From diagnosis to disease management in primary care
Session: From diagnosis to disease management in primary care
Session type: Thematic Poster Session
Number: 4239
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstractE-poster

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
A. D‘Urzo, I. Tamari, J. Bouchard, R. Jhirad, D. Moosa, N. Paterson, P. Jugovic (Toronto, La Malbai, London, Canada). Variation among spirometry interpretation algorithms: Clinical implications. Eur Respir J 2010; 36: Suppl. 54, 4239

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Clinical interpretation of spirometry results
Source: Paris 2018 - Educational material
Year: 2018

Tutorial: Practical hints and pitfalls on CPET interpretation
Source: ERS Skills course - Clinical exercise testing: advanced
Year: 2018

Appropriate interpretation of longitudinal spirometry assessments
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Reference, reliability and risk: advances in lung function
Year: 2013



Clinical exercise testing with reference to lung diseases: indications, standardization and interpretation strategies
Source: Guideline 1997
Year: 1997

Spirometry longitudinal data analysis software (SPIROLA) in a routine clinical laboratory
Source: International Congress 2014 – Respiratory function: quality and new technologies
Year: 2014

Clinical implications
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Pulmonary biomarkers in COPD
Year: 2007


Indication, interpretation and clinical utility of bronchoprovocation testing
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - New ATS/ERS recommendations for bronchoprovocation challenge testing
Year: 2012


Standardization of parameters, theoreticians, interpretation and reports in spirometry
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 178s
Year: 2005

Clinical phenotypes of SARS-CoV-2: implications for clinicians and researchers
Source: Eur Respir J, 55 (5) 2001028; 10.1183/13993003.01028-2020
Year: 2020



Spirometry in clinical use: practical issues
Source: Breathe 2010; 6: 196-203
Year: 2010

Interpretation of spirometry in general practice: pattern recognition and decision-making
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 414s
Year: 2002

Non Specific Spirometric Pattern: Evolving and associations with basic data
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Unusual tools for evaluating obstructive diseases
Year: 2020


Paediatric lung function tests reference values: appropriateness and interpretation
Source: International Congress 2015 – ME10 Paediatric lung function tests reference values
Year: 2015




Clinical exercise testing: basic principles and practice
Source: Breathe, 13 (3) 163; 10.1183/20734735.009717
Year: 2017



Stature measurement: Potential for improved interpretation of pulmonary function
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Quality control in lung function and exercise-related issues
Year: 2011


Clinical prediction guides in COPD, a real life evaluation
Source: International Congress 2019 – Clinical implications of COPD management
Year: 2019

Respiratory monitoring: revisiting classical physiological principles with new tools
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24 : 718-719
Year: 2004


Spiro-Breath:Application for instant,large-scale interpretation of Pulmonary Functional Test
Source: International Congress 2018 – Respiratory physiology and measurements
Year: 2018