Methacholine challenges: comparison of different tidal breathing challenge methods.

J. Dean (Manchester, United Kingdom), L. Connor (Manchester, United Kingdom), N. Jackson (Manchester, United Kingdom), B. Keidel-Morgan (Manchester, United Kingdom), D. Hamer (Manchester, United Kingdom), D. Singh (Manchester, United Kingdom)

Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Advances in lung function testing
Session: Advances in lung function testing
Session type: E-poster session
Number: 3075
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstractE-poster

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
J. Dean (Manchester, United Kingdom), L. Connor (Manchester, United Kingdom), N. Jackson (Manchester, United Kingdom), B. Keidel-Morgan (Manchester, United Kingdom), D. Hamer (Manchester, United Kingdom), D. Singh (Manchester, United Kingdom). Methacholine challenges: comparison of different tidal breathing challenge methods.. 3075

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests
Source: Guideline 2017
Year: 2017

ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests
Source: Eur Respir J, 49 (5) 1601526; 10.1183/13993003.01526-2016
Year: 2017



Comparison of variations of FEV1 and forced oscillation technique during methacholine challenge
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 339s
Year: 2004

Respiratory impedance response to a deep inhalation (DI) in children during methacholine (MCh) challenge
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 347s
Year: 2001

30 Seconds tidal breathing method with AeroEclipse II nebulizer (AE) versus aerosol provocation system (APS) in methacholine challenge testing
Source: International Congress 2014 – Airways: reversibility and responsiveness
Year: 2014


Assessing response to methacholine challenges using a new forced oscillation device
Source: International Congress 2016 – Pathophysiological mechanisms at different levels: lung, airways, muscles and symptom perception
Year: 2016

Methacholine challenge test with impulse oscillometry versus spirometry: which is more sensitive in detecting airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR?)
Source: International Congress 2018 – Clinical and functional monitoring in airway disease
Year: 2018

Methacholine challenge in preschool children: comparison of transcutaneous measurement of oxygen (PtcO2), resistance by interrupter technique (Rint) and specific airway resistance (sRaw)
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 707s
Year: 2006

Methacholine inhalation challenge: a shorter, cheaper and safe approach
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 17: 46-51
Year: 2001



Can airway resistance, measured by the interrupter technique, be useful in evaluating the methacholine bronchial challenge test in children?
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 585s
Year: 2004

Use of within-breath Rrs values at 5 Hz to estimate resistive work of breathing during histamine challenge tests
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 12s
Year: 2002

A comparison of spirometry and airways resistance during histamine challenge testing
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Airway hyperresponsiveness: mechanism and assessment
Year: 2009


Assessment of airway responsiveness: Comparison of forced spirometry and body plethysmography for methacholine challenge tests
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Advances in lung function II
Year: 2010

Assessment of expiratory flow limitation in metacholine challenge in pigs
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 339s
Year: 2004

What more can we learn from body-box measurements compared with spirometry?
Source: Annual Congress 2005 - MP1 - What more can we learn from body-box measurements compared with spirometry?
Year: 2005

ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: pathophysiology and methodology of indirect airway challenge testing
Source: Eur Respir J, 52 (5) 1801033; 10.1183/13993003.01033-2018
Year: 2018



ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: pathophysiology and methodology of indirect airway challenge testing
Source: Eur Respir J 2018; 52: 1801033
Year: 2018

Metacholine challenge test - the ²Yan-method² applying an ²artificial hand²
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 267s
Year: 2004

Reliability, consistency and variability of base-line spirometric and plethysmographic measurements prior to methacholine challenge tests assess airway hyperreactivity (AHR)
Source: International Congress 2016 – The future of lung function is beginning now
Year: 2016


Methacholine challenges for detection of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) – a comparison of forced spirometry and body plethysmography
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Airway hyperresponsiveness: mechanism and assessment
Year: 2009