Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of K-BILD and SGRQ-I

T. Prior (Aarhus, Denmark), N. Hoyer (Copenhagen, Denmark), O. Hilberg (Vejle, Denmark), S. Shaker (Copenhagen, Denmark), J. Davidsen (Odense, Denmark), E. Bendstrup (Aarhus, Denmark)

Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical aspects of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Session: Clinical aspects of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Session type: E-poster session
Number: 771
Disease area: Interstitial lung diseases

Congress or journal article abstractE-poster

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
T. Prior (Aarhus, Denmark), N. Hoyer (Copenhagen, Denmark), O. Hilberg (Vejle, Denmark), S. Shaker (Copenhagen, Denmark), J. Davidsen (Odense, Denmark), E. Bendstrup (Aarhus, Denmark). Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of K-BILD and SGRQ-I. 771

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
The Severe Asthma Questionnaire: sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference
Source: Eur Respir J, 57 (6) 2100300; 10.1183/13993003.00300-2021
Year: 2021



The Severe Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ) - minimal clinically important difference and sensitivity to change
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): easy tools in the management of chronic respiratory diseases
Year: 2021



Minimal clinically important difference of the Brief-BESTest in COPD
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation: part 1
Year: 2020


Minimal clinically important difference of the clinical COPD questionnaire
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 689s
Year: 2004

Minimal clinically important difference and predictive validity of the mMRC and mBorg in acute exacerbations of COPD
Source: International Congress 2017 – Assessing functional outcomes in chronic respiratory disease
Year: 2017


Minimal important difference for the asthma control questionnaire
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 460s
Year: 2004

Minimum clinically important difference of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Source: International Congress 2017 – Risk factors: symptomatology and diagnostic approaches for obstructive sleep apnoea
Year: 2017

Quality of life in severe asthma measured by SAQ and EQ5D questionnaires as a function of clinically relevant cut off points
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical parameters in severe asthma
Year: 2020


The minimal clinically important difference of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire.
Source: International Congress 2018 – Non-invasive ventilation in chronic respiratory failure
Year: 2018

Assessment of cognitive functions in stable COPD patients using PGI Memory Scale and to analyze for their correlation with patients‘ characteristics and BODE index
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Quality of life and clinical parametres in monitoring airway diseases
Year: 2012


The SAQ is a valid quality of life measure in severe asthma: the mini-AQLQ and ACQ both measure symptoms
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Phenotypes of obstructive diseases
Year: 2020


Bronchiectasis Severity Index and FACED score correlation determinants
Source: International Congress 2019 – Phenotypes and endotypes of bronchiectasis
Year: 2019

King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire: responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference
Source: Eur Respir J, 54 (3) 1900281; 10.1183/13993003.00281-2019
Year: 2019



Fatigue changes in IPF patients measured by the Fatigue Assessment Scale during antifibrotic treatment
Source: International Congress 2019 – Innovations in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Year: 2019


The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in Bronchiectasis: Response to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID)
Source: International Congress 2019 – Hot topics in pulmonary rehabilitation
Year: 2019

Are ACQ scores a useful measure of severity in obese patients?
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Disease control and quality of life in airway diseases
Year: 2013


Estimation of minimum clinically important difference in EQ-VAS score after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients
Source: International Congress 2014 – Best posters in chronic care
Year: 2014

Assessing sarcoidosis: The King‘s Sarcoidosis Questionnaire and the minimal important difference
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Cystic lung diseases: lung granulomatosis
Year: 2012

The EQ5D5L in COPD: Validity, responsiveness and minimum important difference (MID)
Source: International Congress 2015 – Latest insights into pulmonary rehabilitation
Year: 2015


Is the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) fit for purpose? A planned study using the SAQ
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical parameters in severe asthma
Year: 2020