Source: Annual Congress 2004 - Primary care: asthma, COPD and tuberculosis
Disease area: Airway diseases



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
J. Klimiuk, K. Wrotek, R. Chazan (Warsaw, Poland). The usefulness of chosen spirometrical parameters in the interpretation of obstruction reversibility test. Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 2955

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Oscillatory resistances measurement is an useful and reliable test to assess bronchial obstruction and reversibility Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 575s Year: 2004 Significance of the forced oscillation technique for evaluation of the bronchodilation test in patients with initial mild airway obstruction Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Unusual tools for evaluating obstructive diseases Year: 2020 Comparison of usefulness of selected lung function tests in the diagnosis of exercise induced bronchoconstriction Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Clinical aspects of asthma and allergic respiratory diseases Year: 2010 Better time management of a lung function laboratory by avoiding redundant ”routinely“ performed reversibility spirometry tests Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 147s Year: 2003 Indication, interpretation and clinical utility of bronchoprovocation testing Source: Annual Congress 2012 - New ATS/ERS recommendations for bronchoprovocation challenge testing Year: 2012 The accuracy of mid expiratory flow and dysanapsis parameters for evaluation of methacholine provocation test Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Airway hyperresponsiveness: mechanism and assessment Year: 2009 When to apply which bronchial challenge test and interpretation of the results Source: Annual Congress 2013 –New ATS/ERS recommendations for bronchial challenge testing Year: 2013 Interpretation of pulmonary function tests and preoperative assessment Source: International Congress 2014 – PG03 Respiratory medicine: diagnosis to treatment from a mentor and junior perspective Year: 2014 Diagnostic value of spirometric parameters in bronchial remodeling estimation in asthma Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 220s Year: 2006 The TLNO/TLCO ratio in pulmonary function test interpretation Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 311 Year: 2004 The TLNO/TLCO ratio in pulmonary function test interpretation Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 310 Year: 2004 Value of the peakflowmeters for reversibility tests Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 84s Year: 2004 Airway obstruction reversibility test in the assessment of COPD severity Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 57s Year: 2005 Explaining predictions of an automated pulmonary function test interpretation algorithm Source: International Congress 2019 – M-health/e-health I Year: 2019 Relationships between bronchial obstruction and differential NO parameters after methacholine challenge testing Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Lung and airway function Year: 2011 Bronchial challenge tests: usefulness, availability and limitations Source: Breathe 2011; 8: 53-60 Year: 2011 Novel spirometry indices detect mild airflow obstruction not detected by traditional criteria Source: International Congress 2018 – New predictors of morbidity and mortality in COPD Year: 2018 The interpretation and discriminatory power of bronchodilator measurements: the influence of baseline lung function and disease type Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 276s Year: 2003 Feasibility and reproducibility of pulmonary function tests in preschoolers Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Lung function today and tomorrow I Year: 2011 Paediatric lung function tests reference values: appropriateness and interpretation Source: International Congress 2015 – ME10 Paediatric lung function tests reference values Year: 2015