e-learning
resources
Glasgow 2004
Sunday 05.09.2004
Standardization of tests and equipment evaluation: from spirometry on wards
Login
Search all ERS
e-learning
resources
Disease Areas
Airways Diseases
Interstitial Lung Diseases
Respiratory Critical Care
Respiratory Infections
Paediatric Respiratory Diseases
Pulmonary Vascular Diseases
Sleep and Breathing Disorders
Thoracic Oncology
Events
International Congress
Courses
Webinars
Conferences
Research Seminars
Journal Clubs
Publications
Breathe
Monograph
ERJ
ERJ Open Research
ERR
European Lung White Book
Handbook Series
Guidelines
All ERS guidelines
e-learning
CME Online
Case reports
Short Videos
SpirXpert
Procedure Videos
CME tests
Reference Database of Respiratory Sounds
Radiology Image Challenge
Brief tobacco interventions
EU Projects
VALUE-Dx
ERN-LUNG
ECRAID
UNITE4TB
Disease Areas
Events
Publications
Guidelines
e-learning
EU Projects
Login
Search
The (un)importance of the time-interval between inhalation and FEV
1
measurement in a methacholine challenge test
E. Ruberg, A. F. J. Brouwer, R. J. Roorda, P. L. P. Brand (Zwolle, The Netherlands)
Source:
Annual Congress 2004 - Standardization of tests and equipment evaluation: from spirometry on wards
Session:
Standardization of tests and equipment evaluation: from spirometry on wards
Session type:
Thematic Poster Session
Number:
1164
Disease area:
Airway diseases, Paediatric lung diseases
Rating:
You must
login
to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
E. Ruberg, A. F. J. Brouwer, R. J. Roorda, P. L. P. Brand (Zwolle, The Netherlands). The (un)importance of the time-interval between inhalation and FEV
1
measurement in a methacholine challenge test. Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 1164
You must
login
to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
No comment yet.
You must
Login
to comment this presentation.
Related content which might interest you:
Late Breaking Abstract - Implications of treatable traits and treatment choices on exacerbation risk in moderate-severe asthma
Management of Severe Asthma in Pediatric Patients by an Interdisciplinary Team in a Public Hospital Setting.
Respiratory sequelae of preterm birth across the life span
Related content which might interest you:
Comparison of FEV1 and PEF values in cough variant asthma during methacholine challenge test
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Cough, airway hyperresponsiveness and asthma control
Year: 2010
The influence of FVC manoeuvres on consecutive FEV
1
values during methacholine challenge
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 587s
Year: 2004
FENO is not a substitute for the methacholine challenge test in children
Source: International Congress 2018 – Paediatric asthma: new mechanisms and tools
Year: 2018
The accuracy of mid expiratory flow and dysanapsis parameters for evaluation of methacholine provocation test
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Airway hyperresponsiveness: mechanism and assessment
Year: 2009
Comparison of variations of FEV
1
and forced oscillation technique during methacholine challenge
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 339s
Year: 2004
Can the interrupter resistance be used to measure airway hyperresponsiveness during the methacholine challenge test as a substitute for FEV1?
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – New insights into lung function testing
Year: 2021
Diagnostic performance of the weight-corrected methacholine bronchial challenge test in children
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 172s
Year: 2002
PD40 sGaw with deep inhalation as alternative for PD20 FEV1
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical characteristics and diagnostic tools for phenotyping asthma and COPD
Year: 2020
Methacholine challenge testing with a single low methacholine concentration
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Airway hyperresponsiveness: mechanism and assessment
Year: 2009
Validation of a single concentration inhalation provocation test (SCIPT) in children
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 540s
Year: 2002
Assessment of airway responsiveness: Comparison of forced spirometry and body plethysmography for methacholine challenge tests
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Advances in lung function II
Year: 2010
Impulse oscillometry (IOS) vs plethismographic methods to detect PD20 in the methacholine challenge test
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Lung and airway function
Year: 2011
A comparison of the response to inhaled histamine measured with FEV
1
and sGaw in healthy subjects
Source: Annual Congress 2003 - Assessing airway function: practicalities and clinical applications
Year: 2003
Particles in exhaled air before and after the methacholine challenge test
Source: International Congress 2019 – Research and innovation in airway diseases
Year: 2019
Relationship between bronchodilator response measured by FEV0.5 and methacholine provocation test in children from 3 to 15 years old
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Paediatric lung function, imaging and methodology in health and disease
Year: 2009
FEV1 and respiratory resistance response to methacholine in children calculated from between-measurement variability
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 43s
Year: 2005
Time of maximal spirometric change after bronchodilator inhalation
Source: International Congress 2017 – Discussion of techniques and technologies in lung function
Year: 2017
sGaw as an alternative for FEV1 in the measurement of airway responsiveness to methacholine in patients experiencing chronic cough
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Lung function today and tomorrow I
Year: 2011
Comparison of exercise provocation and induced sputum measurement in patients with positive methacholine provocation test
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 371s
Year: 2005
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of the cookies.
Accept