Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Advances in lung function II
Disease area: Airway diseases



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
M. Kohlhäufl, F. Nensa, E. M. Marek, H. J. Smith, N. Kotschy-Lang, M. Herrmann, W. Marek (Stuttgart-Gerlingen, Bochum, Hoechberg, Falkenstein, Germany). Assessment of airway responsiveness: Comparison of forced spirometry and body plethysmography for methacholine challenge tests. Eur Respir J 2010; 36: Suppl. 54, 2818

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Evaluating airway resistance changes by body plethysmography in methacholine challenge test Source: International Congress 2016 – Functional assessment of the airways Year: 2016 Reliability, consistency and variability of base-line spirometric and plethysmographic measurements prior to methacholine challenge tests assess airway hyperreactivity (AHR) Source: International Congress 2016 – The future of lung function is beginning now Year: 2016 Airway resistance during the methacholine challenge test: Comparison between impulse oscillometry and plethysmographic technique Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Lung and airway function Year: 2011 Methacholine challenges for detection of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) – a comparison of forced spirometry and body plethysmography Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Airway hyperresponsiveness: mechanism and assessment Year: 2009 Can the interrupter resistance be used to measure airway hyperresponsiveness during the methacholine challenge test as a substitute for FEV1? Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – New insights into lung function testing Year: 2021 Methacholine challenge test with impulse oscillometry versus spirometry: which is more sensitive in detecting airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR?) Source: International Congress 2018 – Clinical and functional monitoring in airway disease Year: 2018 Methacholine challenge induced dyspnoea scores correlate with impulse oscillometry measured airway resistance but not spirometry Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 340s Year: 2004 Comparison of sensitivity of impulse oscillometry, plethysmography and spirometry for measuring bronchodilation in asthma Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 100s Year: 2003 Bronchial provocation in children assessed by spirometry and airway resistance using interrupter technique: Comparison of two methods Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Airways and lung mechanics in subjects of all ages Year: 2010 Alterations in static lung volumes during methacholine challenge (MCH) tests, assessed by whole-body plethysmography using the aerosol provocation system (APS) Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Bronchial challenge as a biomarker of respiratory disease Year: 2012 Relationships between bronchial obstruction and differential NO parameters after methacholine challenge testing Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Lung and airway function Year: 2011 Comparison of bronchodilator responsiveness between forced oscillation technique and spirometry Source: International Congress 2018 – Improvements in the assessment of paediatric physiology Year: 2018 A comparison of spirometry and airways resistance during histamine challenge testing Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Airway hyperresponsiveness: mechanism and assessment Year: 2009 Effects of inhaled histamine and methacholine on the lung function parameters obtained by spirometry and forced oscillations in asthmatic children Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Lung function from infancy to adulthood Year: 2010 Concordance between oscillometric and spirometric lung function measures in bronchodilator response test for the detection of airway obstruction Source: International Congress 2016 – What's new in paediatric respiratory physiology? Year: 2016 The accuracy of mid expiratory flow and dysanapsis parameters for evaluation of methacholine provocation test Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Airway hyperresponsiveness: mechanism and assessment Year: 2009 Comparison of variations of FEV1 and forced oscillation technique during methacholine challenge Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 339s Year: 2004 Validity of the forced expiratory flow 25-75 for identification of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in a pulmonary function laboratory Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Airway calibre, airway challenge and assessment of oxygenation Year: 2013 Diagnostic performance of the weight-corrected methacholine bronchial challenge test in children Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 172s Year: 2002 Comparison of FEV1 and PEF values in cough variant asthma during methacholine challenge test Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Cough, airway hyperresponsiveness and asthma control Year: 2010