IL D-dimer outperforms pretest scoring systems in assessment of pulmonary embolism Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 269s Year: 2005
Feasibility of pretest probability scoring to predict pulmonary embolism (PE) in routine clinical practice Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 219s Year: 2003
D-dimer testing and pre-test probability scoring in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Prediction of pulmonary thromboembolism Year: 2011
Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment for suspected pulmonary embolism Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 238s Year: 2002
Clinical probability and d-dimer utility in the context of suspected pulmonary embolism: The safe approach Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Pulmonary venous thromboembolic disease Year: 2010
Diagnostic values of scoring systems in the clinical approach to pulmonary thromboembolism Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Prediction of pulmonary thromboembolism Year: 2011
Prediction of the severity of pulmonary embolism according to clinical pre-test and D-dimer concentration Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 402s Year: 2006
Comparison between semiquantitative and quantitative measurements of D-dimers for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 462s Year: 2003
Comparison of the clinical probability scores and diagnostic tests of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Pulmonary venous thromboembolic disease Year: 2008
Comparison of two clinical probability scores combined with C-reactive protein and D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Pulmonary embolism Year: 2009
The comparison of three different clinical probability methods and the ECG score in patients with suspected venous thromboembolism Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Venous thromboembolic disease Year: 2007
Validation of a non-invasive diagnostic algorithm in assessment of patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 238s Year: 2002
Evaluation of different scoring methods in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Pulmonary venous thromboembolic disease and other pulmonary vascular disorders Year: 2010
A structured clinical model for predicting the probability of pulmonary embolism Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 559s Year: 2004
Clinical experience does not affect pre-test clinical probability scores used to exclude pulmonary embolism Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 238s Year: 2002
Comparison of three clinical scoring methods in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism Source: Annual Congress 2006 - Pulmonary embolism Year: 2006
Comparison of three clinical prediction rules among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 685s Year: 2004
Clinical usefulness of D-dimer according to clinical probability in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 220s Year: 2003
Can implementation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) safely reduce D-dimer and CTPA requests in a two-tier Wells model? Source: International Congress 2019 – Pulmonary embolism: from diagnosis to prognosis and treatment Year: 2019
Comparision of the severity of the disease and 4 different clinical scoring systems in pulmonary embolism Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Pulmonary embolism and cardiovascular diseases Year: 2009