Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Lunchtime Programme "How to review papers?"



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
J. Soriano (Bunyola, Mallorca Illes Balear, Spain). What is a good review?. Annual Congress 2009 - Lunchtime Programme "How to review papers?"

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Do we know what physical activity means in COPD? A systematic review Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Methods in respiratory epidemiology Year: 2010 Which patient-reported measure for physical activity should we use? A systematic review Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Methods in respiratory epidemiology Year: 2010 Why should we publish? Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Medical writing Year: 2020 Long-term condition (LTC) review templates in clinical consultations: A mixed-methods systematic review Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Organising respiratory disease management in primary care Year: 2020 COVID-19 and COPD: a narrative review of the basic science and clinical outcomes Source: Eur Respir Rev, 29 (158) 200199; 10.1183/16000617.0199-2020 Year: 2020 Current evidence for COVID-19 therapies: a systematic literature review Source: Eur Respir Rev, 30 (159) 200384; 10.1183/16000617.0384-2020 Year: 2021 Where do we stand with asthma phenotypes derived from data-driven methods? A systematic review Source: International Congress 2019 – Respiratory function assessment in disease Year: 2019 Artificial intelligence techniques in asthma: a systematic review and critical appraisal of the existing literature Source: Eur Respir J, 56 (3) 2000521; 10.1183/13993003.00521-2020 Year: 2020 Empowering children with asthma: a framework for clinical practice based on a qualitative literature review Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Risk factors, comorbidities and remote monitoring in childhood asthma Year: 2020 Reviewing recent research on peer review: myths and reality Source: Annual Congress 2011 - BMJ/ERJ Symposium – Peer reviewing Year: 2011 The national review of asthma deaths: what did we learn and what needs to change? Source: Breathe 2015; 11:14-24 Year: 2015 Clinical outcome measures for use in primary ciliary dyskinesia research: a scoping systematic review Source: International Congress 2019 – Aetiology and management of childhood respiratory infections, primary ciliary dyskinesia and asthma Year: 2019 The safety of cardioselective ß1-blockers in asthma: literature review and search of global pharmacovigilance safety reports Source: ERJ Open Res, 7 (1) 00801-2020; 10.1183/23120541.00801-2020 Year: 2021 A review of outcomes from a novel long-COVID clinic. Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Pulmonary rehabilitation in the COVID-19 era Year: 2021 Palliative and end of life care conversations in COPD - a systematic literature review Source: International Congress 2017 – Best abstracts in physical activity and management of COPD Year: 2017 Good news about a bad subject: scientific evidence to help defeat multidrug/extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 5-7 Year: 2014 Evidence provided by recent meta-analyses on treatment: what is new? Source: Annual Congress 2012 - PG7 TB and MDR-/XDR-TB: what is new in diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (TB PAN-NET) Year: 2012 How do we know what works? Clinical trial end-points and quality of life assessment Source: Eur Respir Monogr 2018; 81: 99-132 Year: 2018 A systematic review and meta-analysis of complementary and alternative medicine in asthma Source: Eur Respir Rev 2017; 26: 160092 Year: 2017