e-learning
resources
Vienna 2009
Monday, 14.09.2009
Quality control in lung function and new developments
Login
Search all ERS
e-learning
resources
Disease Areas
Airways Diseases
Interstitial Lung Diseases
Respiratory Critical Care
Respiratory Infections
Paediatric Respiratory Diseases
Pulmonary Vascular Diseases
Sleep and Breathing Disorders
Thoracic Oncology
Events
International Congress
Courses
Webinars
Conferences
Research Seminars
Journal Clubs
Publications
Breathe
Monograph
ERJ
ERJ Open Research
ERR
European Lung White Book
Handbook Series
Guidelines
All ERS guidelines
e-learning
CME Online
Case reports
Short Videos
SpirXpert
Procedure Videos
CME tests
Reference Database of Respiratory Sounds
Radiology Image Challenge
Brief tobacco interventions
EU Projects
VALUE-Dx
ERN-LUNG
ECRAID
UNITE4TB
Disease Areas
Events
Publications
Guidelines
e-learning
EU Projects
Login
Search
Evaluation of a method for establishing biologic quality control ranges from the first 20 acceptable test sessions in a large multi-center study
S. Blonshine, R. Warshaw, R. Harris, S. Cangiamilla (Mason, Paramus, United States Of America)
Source:
Annual Congress 2009 - Quality control in lung function and new developments
Session:
Quality control in lung function and new developments
Session type:
E-Communication Session
Number:
1843
Rating:
You must
login
to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
S. Blonshine, R. Warshaw, R. Harris, S. Cangiamilla (Mason, Paramus, United States Of America). Evaluation of a method for establishing biologic quality control ranges from the first 20 acceptable test sessions in a large multi-center study. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: Suppl. 53, 1843
You must
login
to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
No comment yet.
You must
Login
to comment this presentation.
Related content which might interest you:
Endoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves in very low DLCO patients
A modified staged treatment algorithm using the AeriSeal System
Body plethysmography
Related content which might interest you:
Evaluation of factors to consider prior to adjustment of biologic quality control ranges using data from a large multi-centre clinical trial
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Quality control in lung function and new developments
Year: 2009
Evaluation of data requirements to establish biologic quality control ranges in a multi-center clinical trial for inhaled insulin
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - New challenges and maintained quality: lung function for the future
Year: 2008
Comprehensive comparison of the repeatability of the most commonly employed tests of exercise performance for patients with stable COPD. An observational study.
Source: International Congress 2018 – Let’s interact and discuss the hot topics in pulmonary rehabilitation
Year: 2018
Evaluation of biological quality control variance in a multi-center clinical trial for inhaled insulin
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Quality, sleep and physiology
Year: 2007
Impact of FVC/SVC relationship and TLC/VA relationship on biologic quality control CV in a large multi-centre clinical trial
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Quality control in lung function and new developments
Year: 2009
Effectiveness
versus
efficacy trials in COPD: how study design influences outcomes and applicability
Source: Eur Respir J, 51 (2) 1701531; 10.1183/13993003.01531-2017
Year: 2018
Reference values for seven different protocols of functional tests: a multicentre study
Source: International Congress 2019 – Insights into assessment of functional status in respiratory disease patients
Year: 2019
A long term randomized clinical study of 300 asthmatics. An internet based asthma monitoring tool improves quality of life significantly
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 261s
Year: 2004
A technical and functional assessment of office spirometry devices. A multicentre comparative study
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 87s
Year: 2004
A study of the effectiveness of individual components of pulmonary rehabilitation when compared with the combined programme and standard treatment
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 209s
Year: 2004
Can locus of control become a useful indicator for a multicentre study: data from the Edu-Care® study
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 263s
Year: 2002
Do marker states improve measurement properties of utility instruments: a randomized multi-center trial in patients with chronic respiratory disease
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 295s
Year: 2004
Biological quality control for spirometry in a multi-centred clinical trial
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Quality spirometry: the only spirometry!
Year: 2008
An interlaboratory quality control programme for the measurement of tuberculosis drugs
Source: Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 268-271
Year: 2015
Development of standardisation criteria for the measurement of lung clearance index in a multi-centre study
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Advances in respiratory mechanics
Year: 2007
Use of indigenously designed online spirometry quality assessment system in multi-centric clinical trials in India
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Advances in lung function II
Year: 2010
Monitoring quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic bronchoscopic intervention: a pilot study
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 430s
Year: 2003
The outcome of establishing a quality control check on practise based spirometry
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 184s
Year: 2005
Measurement error of single breath diffusion using three systems on separate occasions.
(Dutch quality control multi-center trial)
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Quality control in lung function and new developments
Year: 2009
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of the cookies.
Accept