Adeherence to spirometry reproducibility guidelines – a re-audit

C. Billings, C. Billings, A. Charlesworth, J. Phillips, A. Proctor, I. Smith, L. Smith (Sheffield, United Kingdom)

Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Quality spirometry: the only spirometry!
Session: Quality spirometry: the only spirometry!
Session type: E-Communication Session
Number: 3213
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstractE-poster

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
C. Billings, C. Billings, A. Charlesworth, J. Phillips, A. Proctor, I. Smith, L. Smith (Sheffield, United Kingdom). Adeherence to spirometry reproducibility guidelines – a re-audit. Eur Respir J 2008; 32: Suppl. 52, 3213

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Adherence to acceptability and reproducibility criteria for spirometry in complex lung function laboratories
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 280s
Year: 2006

Impact of incorporating the evaluation of full inflation recommended in the 2019 spirometry standards on the evaluation of spirometry acceptability
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – New insights into lung function testing
Year: 2021


Deep-learning algorithm helps to standardise ATS/ERS spirometric acceptability and usability criteria
Source: Eur Respir J, 56 (6) 2000603; 10.1183/13993003.00603-2020
Year: 2020



Spirometry training does not guarantee valid results
Source: Annual Congress 2005 - Spirometry - now and in the future
Year: 2005


Adherence to spirometry reproducibility guidelines in a hospital respiratory function unit
Source: Eur Respir J 2007; 30: Suppl. 51, 180s
Year: 2007

Laboratory compliance with published acceptability criteria for spirometry and influencing factors
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 280s
Year: 2006

Impact on spirometry quality results when using 2005 or 2019 ATS/ERS guidelines
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Future advances in respiratory physiology
Year: 2021


Interpretating the results of spirometry and anamnesis into a diagnose and an advice for treatment: validation and reliability
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 87s
Year: 2004

Outcomes of the task force recommendations for a European spirometry certification programme
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Quality and accreditation in lung function
Year: 2009

Does feedback improve compliance to the ATS/ERS 2005 acceptability criteria in our lung function laboratory?
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Quality spirometry: the only spirometry!
Year: 2008


Spirometry training courses are not enough to achieve quality spirometry in the community
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Going with the flow: assessment and evaluation of airway function and its role in patient management
Year: 2012


Achieving quality spirometry in the office
Source: Breathe 2010; 6: 211-219
Year: 2010

ERS Spirometry Driving Licence: spirometry training and the benefits of quality measurements
Source: International Congress 2016 – Implementation of collaborative lung function testing
Year: 2016


An assessment of physicians knowledge of the GINA guidelines
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Medical education
Year: 2011


Accuracy of spirometry performed by general practitioners
Source: Eur Respir J 2007; 30: Suppl. 51, 127s
Year: 2007

Organising a European spirometry training programme
Source: International Congress 2015 – PG1 Spirometry – train the trainer
Year: 2015




Organising a European spirometry training programme
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - PG20 European spirometry train-the-trainer programme
Year: 2012


ERS/ATS technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests
Source: Guideline 2021
Year: 2021