Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 9-11



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
Niederman M. S., Feldman C., Richards G. A.. Combining information from prognostic scoring tools for CAP: an American view on how to get the best of all worlds. Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 9-11

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Adding biological markers to COPD categorisation schemes: a way towards more personalised care? Source: Eur Respir J 2016; 47:1601-1605 Year: 2016 Applications of clinical exercise testing: different formats, different prognostic outcomes Source: International Congress 2014 – PG07 Cardiopulmonary exercise testing Year: 2014 Applications of clinical exercise testing: different formats, different prognostic outcomes Source: Annual Congress 2013 –PG14 Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the evaluation of patients with respiratory diseases Year: 2013 Physicians or prediction rules; who is better at predicting prognosis? Source: Eur Respir J 2007; 30: Suppl. 51, 124s Year: 2007 Clinical prognostic tools and their use in COPD. Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical and functional evaluation of COPD Year: 2020 Patient’s views on a computer decision support for diagnosing asthma: a qualitative study. Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Primary care diagnosis and multimorbidities Year: 2021 TH2-high asthma: a practical approach with cases and interactive questions Source: International Congress 2019 – Severe asthma guidelines: update 2019 Year: 2019 Integration of molecular testing in the classification of NSCLC: the French experience Source: International Congress 2014 – The more in-depth classification of lung cancer: relevance for patients and science Year: 2014 Multinational dimension of a knowledge-based examination: potential and limitations Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Lunchtime programme: Educational seminar - Harmonising standards for education and training in respiratory medicine: prospects and challenges Year: 2008 Clinical prediction guides in COPD, a real life evaluation Source: International Congress 2019 – Clinical implications of COPD management Year: 2019 Linking clinical algorithms to precision medicine Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Precision endotyping of asthma: time for action Year: 2020 Clinical phenotyping of COPD patients: a simple tool with prognosis value Source: International Congress 2018 – COPD phenotypes: a1 antitrypsin deficiency and beyond Year: 2018 PICADAR score as an evaluation tool of Greek physicians’ PCD awareness Source: International Congress 2019 – A mixture of rare lung diseases Year: 2019 Which modelling methodology is best? Source: ERS Research Seminar 2017 – The impact of air pollution on respiratory health Year: 2018 Big data analysis in telemedicine in sleep: the European status, opportunities and pitfalls Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Digital health meets sleep breathing disorders Year: 2021 Features of asthma management: quantifying the patient‘s perspective using discrete choice modelling Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 122s Year: 2006 New uses of data: from big data to artificial intelligence and clinical decision tools  in children with respiratory diseases Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – New technologies for the management of children with respiratory diseases Year: 2021 Integration of multi-omics datasets enables molecular classification of COPD Source: Eur Respir J, 51 (5) 1701930; 10.1183/13993003.01930-2017 Year: 2018 Definition and validation of a predictive model to identify COPD patients from administrative databases Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Respiratory epidemiology: methods, definitions and phenotypes Year: 2011