Is Virtual Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) a feasible and effective alternative to Face to Face?
L. Moth (London, United Kingdom), V. Padmanaban (London, United Kingdom), C. Phillip (London, United Kingdom), L. Adam (London, United Kingdom), M. Michelle (London, United Kingdom), M. Clare (London, United Kingdom), D. Brendan (London, United Kingdom), K. Zoe (London, United Kingdom), K. Helena (London, United Kingdom), E. Sarah (London, United Kingdom)
Source: International Congress 2022 – Accessibility and personalised approach to pulmonary rehabilitation
 
Rating: 
You must login to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
L. Moth (London, United Kingdom), V. Padmanaban (London, United Kingdom), C. Phillip (London, United Kingdom), L. Adam (London, United Kingdom), M. Michelle (London, United Kingdom), M. Clare (London, United Kingdom), D. Brendan (London, United Kingdom), K. Zoe (London, United Kingdom), K. Helena (London, United Kingdom), E. Sarah (London, United Kingdom). Is Virtual Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) a feasible and effective alternative to Face to Face?. 3354
You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
Related content which might interest you:
|
|