Benefits of tiotropium/olodaterol compared with tiotropium in patients with COPD receiving only LAMA at baseline: pooled analysis of 4 clinical trials

R. Buhl (Mainz, Germany), D. Singh (Manchester, United Kingdom), A. De La Hoz (Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany), F. Voß (Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany), G. Ferguson (Farmington Hills, United States of America)

Source: International Congress 2019 – COPD clinical studies: bronchodilators, corticosteroids and more
Session: COPD clinical studies: bronchodilators, corticosteroids and more
Session type: Poster Discussion
Number: 3382
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstractE-poster

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
R. Buhl (Mainz, Germany), D. Singh (Manchester, United Kingdom), A. De La Hoz (Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany), F. Voß (Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany), G. Ferguson (Farmington Hills, United States of America). Benefits of tiotropium/olodaterol compared with tiotropium in patients with COPD receiving only LAMA at baseline: pooled analysis of 4 clinical trials. 3382

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Indacaterol/glycopyrronium vs tiotropium or glycopyrronium in treatment naive COPD patients: a pooled analysis
Source: International Congress 2018 – COPD management
Year: 2018


COPD patients continuing salmeterol or switched to tiotropium: a retrospective analysis of clinical trial data
Source: Eur Respir J 2007; 30: Suppl. 51, 612s
Year: 2007

Comparison of cardiovascular safety in a pooled analysis of COPD trials comparing tiotropium with salmeterol
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Clinical trials of LAMAs, LABAs, MABAs and theophylline for asthma and COPD
Year: 2013


Cardiac events among patients with CV comorbidities: Pooled analysis of COPD trials comparing tiotropium with salmeterol
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Clinical trials of LAMAs, LABAs, MABAs and theophylline for asthma and COPD
Year: 2013


Once-daily QVA149 provides superior improvements in lung function compared with glycopyrronium and tiotropium in severe COPD patients: A 52 week pooled analysis
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Clinical trials of LAMAs, LABAs, MABAs and theophylline for asthma and COPD
Year: 2013

Efficacy and safety of QVA149 compared with salmeterol/fluticasone combination (SFC) in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe COPD: A subgroup analysis from the LANTERN study
Source: International Congress 2015 – Safety of and interactions between current treatments for asthma and COPD
Year: 2015

A pooled analysis of FEV1 decline in COPD patients randomized to inhaled corticosteroids or placebo
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 764s
Year: 2006

Once-daily QVA149 improves dyspnoea and health status compared with tiotropium plus formoterol in patients without ICS use: A post-hoc analysis of the QUANTIFY study
Source: International Congress 2015 – New data on established treatments for asthma and COPD
Year: 2015


QVA149 is more efficacious than tiotropium and salmeterol/fluticasone combination (SFC) in improving patient-reported outcomes and lung function in COPD patients with moderate-to-severe baseline dyspnoea: The IGNITE trials
Source: International Congress 2015 – New data on established treatments for asthma, COPD and bronchiectasis
Year: 2015

Effectiveness of combination therapy with tiotropium in COPD. A secondary analysis of the UPLIFT trial
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Functional insights into COPD
Year: 2009

Twice-daily aclidinium bromide in COPD patients: A pooled analysis of lung function in the ACCORD-COPD I and ATTAIN trials
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Trials in COPD: novel treatments and insights
Year: 2012

Factors influencing LAMA addition to COPD patients receiving ICS/LABA in clinical practice-RETRIEVE study.
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Inhaled treatments for COPD: clinical trials and real-world studies
Year: 2021


Once-daily QVA149 improves lung function and health status versus twice-daily salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) in symptomatic GOLD B and GOLD D COPD patients: LANTERN/ILLUMINATE pooled analysis
Source: International Congress 2015 – New data on established treatments for asthma, COPD and bronchiectasis
Year: 2015


Comparison of LAMA/LABA vs ICS/LABA in high risk COPD patients: Pre-specified analysis on lung function and health status from the IMPACT trial
Source: International Congress 2018 – COPD management
Year: 2018


Efficacy of indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in current and ex-smokers: a pooled analysis of IGNITE trials
Source: ERJ Open Res, 7 (1) 00816-2020; 10.1183/23120541.00816-2020
Year: 2021



Efficacy of indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in current and ex-smokers: a pooled analysis of IGNITE trials
Source: International Congress 2018 – COPD management
Year: 2018


Once-daily QVA149 demonstrates superior improvements in patient-reported dyspnea compared to tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD: The BLAZE study
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Asthma and COPD management: novel clinical findings
Year: 2013


The efficacy of salmeterol/fluticasone (SF) for 6-month therapy in severe COPD patients
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 30s
Year: 2006

Once-daily NVA237 reduces exacerbations and improves symptoms in COPD patients: A pooled analysis of the GLOW1 and GLOW2 studies
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Trials in COPD: novel treatments and insights
Year: 2012


Efficacy and safety of aclidinium/formoterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone: a phase 3 COPD study
Source: Eur Respir J 2016; 48: 1030-1039
Year: 2016