Extended criteria in donor selection: are we pushing the boundaries?

D. Van Raemdonck (Leuven, Belgium)

Source: International Congress 2019 – Lung transplantation in 2019: where are we?

Session: Lung transplantation in 2019: where are we?
Session type: Symposium
Number: 462

Disease area: -

Rating:

You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
D. Van Raemdonck (Leuven, Belgium). Extended criteria in donor selection: are we pushing the boundaries?. International Congress 2019 – Lung transplantation in 2019: where are we?

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

You must Login to comment this presentation.

Related content which might interest you:

Identifying usable donor organs : pushing the boundaries Source: School Course 2012 - Lung Transplantation Year: 2012
Application of management guidelines to the assessment of new medicines: driving us forward or holding us back? Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 23: 793-794 Year: 2004
Expanding the donor pools: options and results Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Update on lung transplantation 2008 Year: 2008
Pushing the boundaries of usable donors: marginal donors Source: ERS Course 2016 Year: 2016
Alveolization: does "A" stand for appropriate morphometry? Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: 331-332 Year: 2004
Reply to: When adopting Global Lung Function Initiative reference values, can we also adapt them to a local context as needed? Source: Eur Respir J, 58 (3) 2102020; 10.1183/13993003.02020-2021 Year: 2021
Reply: Fixed breathing protocols in multiple-breath-washout testing: truly an option in children? Source: Eur Respir J, 57 (3) 2100189; 10.1183/13993003.00189-2021 Year: 2021
Workshop - A strategy to acquire the data that will satisfy regulatory bodies Source: Research Seminar 2012 - Preparing for the first early pulmonary intervention studies in infants and preschool childrenwith Cystic Fibrosis Year: 2012
Workstation 2: Data acquisition: what can go wrong? What does it look like when it goes right? Source: International Congress 2015 – EW25 Hands-on polysomnography Year: 2015
Workstation 2: Data acquisition: what can go wrong? What does it look like when it goes right? Source: International Congress 2015 – EW27 Hands-on polysomnography Year: 2015
Is our approach to basic research right? Pitfalls and successes: what is the way forward? Source: ERS Research Seminar 2016 Year: 2016
Workable instruments and tools realising active patient participation: a set of criteria from the patient's perspective Source: Annual Congress 2011 - The value of patients as partners in research Year: 2011
High-urgent (HU) lung transplantation: a single centre's experience with the new German allocation guidelines Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 563s Year: 2002