Comparison of LAMA/LABA vs ICS/LABA in high risk COPD patients: Pre-specified analysis on lung function and health status from the IMPACT trial

D. Lipson (Pennsylvania, United States of America), F. Barnhart (Research Triangle Park, United States of America), I. Boucot (Brentford, United Kingdom), C. Crim (Research Triangle Park, United States of America), N. Brealey (Uxbridge, United Kingdom), G. Criner (Philadelpha , United States of America), M. Dransfield (Birmingham , United States of America), D. Halpin (Exeter, United Kingdom), S. Kilbride (Uxbridge, United Kingdom), M. Han (Ann Arbor, United States of America), P. Lange (Copenhagen, Denmark), D. Lomas (London, United Kingdom), F. Martinez (New York, United States of America), D. Singh (Manchester, United Kingdom), I. Naya (Brentford, United Kingdom), C. Jones (Research Triangle Park, United States of America), R. Wise (Baltimore, United States of America)

Source: International Congress 2018 – COPD management
Session: COPD management
Session type: Thematic Poster
Number: 4385
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstractE-poster

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
D. Lipson (Pennsylvania, United States of America), F. Barnhart (Research Triangle Park, United States of America), I. Boucot (Brentford, United Kingdom), C. Crim (Research Triangle Park, United States of America), N. Brealey (Uxbridge, United Kingdom), G. Criner (Philadelpha , United States of America), M. Dransfield (Birmingham , United States of America), D. Halpin (Exeter, United Kingdom), S. Kilbride (Uxbridge, United Kingdom), M. Han (Ann Arbor, United States of America), P. Lange (Copenhagen, Denmark), D. Lomas (London, United Kingdom), F. Martinez (New York, United States of America), D. Singh (Manchester, United Kingdom), I. Naya (Brentford, United Kingdom), C. Jones (Research Triangle Park, United States of America), R. Wise (Baltimore, United States of America). Comparison of LAMA/LABA vs ICS/LABA in high risk COPD patients: Pre-specified analysis on lung function and health status from the IMPACT trial. 4385

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Exacerbation outcomes with LAMA/LABA and ICS/LABA in high risk COPD patients in the IMPACT trial
Source: International Congress 2018 – COPD management
Year: 2018


Economic evaluation of the impact of exacerbation frequency in COPD patients treated with single-inhaler triple therapy in Spain: The IMPACT trial
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Pharmacological management of COPD
Year: 2020


Benefits of tiotropium/olodaterol compared with tiotropium in patients with COPD receiving only LAMA at baseline: pooled analysis of 4 clinical trials
Source: International Congress 2019 – COPD clinical studies: bronchodilators, corticosteroids and more
Year: 2019


GLISTEN Study subanalysis: Glycopyrronium differentially improves lung function, health status and rescue medication use when added to salmeterol/fluticasone in COPD severity groups
Source: International Congress 2015 – New data on established treatments for asthma, COPD and bronchiectasis
Year: 2015

Comparative efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol versus LABA/LAMA therapies in COPD: A network meta-analysis
Source: International Congress 2016 – Pharmacological treatment of COPD: focus on LABA/LAMA combinations
Year: 2016


Once-daily QVA149 improves lung function and health status versus twice-daily salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) in symptomatic GOLD B and GOLD D COPD patients: LANTERN/ILLUMINATE pooled analysis
Source: International Congress 2015 – New data on established treatments for asthma, COPD and bronchiectasis
Year: 2015


Influence of patient baseline characteristics and concomitant medication on outcomes in long-term trials of COPD: Analysis of the UPLIFT® trial
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Clinical trials of LAMAs, LABAs, MABAs and theophylline for asthma and COPD
Year: 2013

Factors influencing LAMA addition to COPD patients receiving ICS/LABA in clinical practice-RETRIEVE study.
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Inhaled treatments for COPD: clinical trials and real-world studies
Year: 2021


QVA149 once-daily is safe and well tolerated and improves lung function and health status in Japanese patients with COPD: The ARISE study
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –New clinical trials of asthma and COPD drugs
Year: 2013

Effectiveness of combination therapy with tiotropium in COPD. A secondary analysis of the UPLIFT trial
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Functional insights into COPD
Year: 2009

Single inhaler triple therapy in patients with COPD: patient-reported dyspnoea and health status from the IMPACT Trial
Source: International Congress 2018 – Integrating pharmacological and non-pharmacological management in COPD: are we there yet?
Year: 2018




Overall and cardiovascular safety of aclidinium/formoterol fixed-dose combination versus salmeterol/fluticasone in patients with COPD
Source: International Congress 2015 – Safety of and interactions between current treatments for asthma and COPD
Year: 2015


LABA/LAMA combination in COPD: a meta-analysis on the duration of treatment
Source: Eur Respir Rev 2017; 26: 160043
Year: 2017



Cardiac events among patients with CV comorbidities: Pooled analysis of COPD trials comparing tiotropium with salmeterol
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Clinical trials of LAMAs, LABAs, MABAs and theophylline for asthma and COPD
Year: 2013


Switch from LABA+ICS to a LABA/LAMA combination in symptomatic women with COPD – an analysis of the observational DACCORD study
Source: International Congress 2018 – Pharmacological management of COPD
Year: 2018


Gender differences in health status in patients with COPD: baseline characteristics of a multi-centre intervention and characterisation study on Seretide (COSMIC)
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 262s
Year: 2002

Efficacy and safety of QVA149 compared with salmeterol/fluticasone combination (SFC) in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe COPD: A subgroup analysis from the LANTERN study
Source: International Congress 2015 – Safety of and interactions between current treatments for asthma and COPD
Year: 2015

Once-daily QVA149 improves dyspnoea and health status compared with tiotropium plus formoterol in patients without ICS use: A post-hoc analysis of the QUANTIFY study
Source: International Congress 2015 – New data on established treatments for asthma and COPD
Year: 2015


Efficacy of mometasone/indacaterol/glycopyrronium (MF/IND/GLY) on lung function and exacerbations in patients with inadequately controlled asthma with high-dose ICS/LABA therapy (on GINA step 5) prior to study entry: Results from IRIDIUM study
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Asthma inhalers: new devices and adherence
Year: 2021


QVA149 is more efficacious than tiotropium and salmeterol/fluticasone combination (SFC) in improving patient-reported outcomes and lung function in COPD patients with moderate-to-severe baseline dyspnoea: The IGNITE trials
Source: International Congress 2015 – New data on established treatments for asthma, COPD and bronchiectasis
Year: 2015