Source: ERJ Open Res, 3 (4) 00011-2017; 10.1183/23120541.00011-2017
Disease area: Airway diseases



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
Katrina O. Tonga, Paul D. Robinson, Claude S. Farah, Greg G. King, Cindy Thamrin. In vitro and in vivo functional residual capacity comparisons between multiple-breath nitrogen washout devices. ERJ Open Res, 3 (4) 00011-2017; 10.1183/23120541.00011-2017

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: The bias flow nitrogen washout technique for measuring the functional residual capacity in infants Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 17: 529-536 Year: 2001 Modifications to a photoacoustic gas analyser increases accuracy of functional residual capacity measurements by multiple breath washout of SF6 in an infant lung model Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Clinical applications of ventilatory function tests in paediatric pulmonology Year: 2008 Comparison of helium dilution and sulphur hexafluoride multiple breath measurements of functional residual capacity in neonates Source: Eur Respir J 2007; 30: Suppl. 51, 396s Year: 2007 In vitro validation of nitrogen multiple breath washout using ultrasonic equipment Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Advances in lung function testing from infancy to adulthood Year: 2011 Estimation of lung functional residual capacity by the multiple-breath washout test versus bodyplethysmography in healthy subjects Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Lung function diagnostics Year: 2020 Determination of functional residual capacity and moment ratio from multiple breath inert gas wash-ins Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Lung function in respiratory disease Year: 2008 Comparison of measures of ventilation heterogeneity derived from multiple breath inert gas washout Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Pathophysiological mechanisms in disease: new insights Year: 2012 In-vivo and in-vitro functional residual capacity comparisons between multiple breath nitrogen washout devices Source: International Congress 2016 – Pathophysiological mechanisms at different levels: lung, airways, muscles and symptom perception Year: 2016 Simultaneous sulfur hexafluoride and nitrogen multiple-breath washout (MBW) to examine inherent differences in MBW outcomes Source: ERJ Open Res, 5 (4) 00234-2018; 10.1183/23120541.00234-2018 Year: 2019 Double-tracer gas single breath washout - Variability and reproducibility compared with classical nitrogen washout tests Source: Annual Congress 2013 –New issues in lung function testing Year: 2013 Comparison of single-breath diffusion capacity of the lung using CO and NO with reduced time of holding breath Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Beyond spirometry: the skills behind lung function testing Year: 2008 A novel device for the measurement of functional residual capacity (FRC) Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 203s Year: 2006 Measurement of functional residual capacity in mechanically ventilated monkeys using the molar mass signal of an ultrasonic flow meter compared to the nitrogen washout method Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 455s Year: 2001 CO diffusing capacity: are adjustments of CO diffusing capacity necessary? Source: Annual Congress 2006 - Implementation of the new standards on clinical pulmonary function testing Year: 2006 The effects of lung volume reduction treatment on diffusing capacity and gas exchange Source: Eur Respir Rev, 29 (158) 190171; 10.1183/16000617.0171-2019 Year: 2020 Feasibility and variability of the double-tracer gas single-breath washout in a paediatric field study. Source: International Congress 2019 – Evaluation of breathing in children when they are asleep, healthy or ill Year: 2019 Validation of a multiple breath inert gas washout technique using a lung phantom Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Various issues in clinical physiology Year: 2012 Defining the appropriate waiting time between multiple-breath nitrogen washout measurements Source: Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 1489-1491 Year: 2015 Functional residual capacity measurements in healthy infants: ultrasonic flow meter versus a mass spectrometer Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 23: 763-768 Year: 2004