e-learning
resources
Milan 2017
Wednesday, 13.09.2017
Controversies in community-acquired pneumonia: a pro and con debate
Login
Search all ERS
e-learning
resources
Disease Areas
Airways Diseases
Interstitial Lung Diseases
Respiratory Critical Care
Respiratory Infections
Paediatric Respiratory Diseases
Pulmonary Vascular Diseases
Sleep and Breathing Disorders
Thoracic Oncology
Events
International Congress
Courses
Webinars
Conferences
Research Seminars
Journal Clubs
Publications
Breathe
Monograph
ERJ
ERJ Open Research
ERR
European Lung White Book
Handbook Series
Guidelines
All ERS guidelines
e-learning
CME Online
Case reports
Short Videos
SpirXpert
Procedure Videos
CME tests
Reference Database of Respiratory Sounds
Radiology Image Challenge
Brief tobacco interventions
EU Projects
VALUE-Dx
ERN-LUNG
ECRAID
UNITE4TB
Disease Areas
Events
Publications
Guidelines
e-learning
EU Projects
Login
Search
Should macrolides be given to all patients with community-acquired pneumonia? Pro argument
Antonio Anzueto (San Antonio, United States of America)
Source:
International Congress 2017 – Controversies in community-acquired pneumonia: a pro and con debate
Session:
Controversies in community-acquired pneumonia: a pro and con debate
Session type:
Symposium
Number:
4797
Disease area:
Respiratory infections
Rating:
You must
login
to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
Antonio Anzueto (San Antonio, United States of America). Should macrolides be given to all patients with community-acquired pneumonia? Pro argument. International Congress 2017 – Controversies in community-acquired pneumonia: a pro and con debate
You must
login
to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
No comment yet.
You must
Login
to comment this presentation.
Related content which might interest you:
Panel discussion: Diagnostic tools for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea in adults and children
Expert interview: Physiological classification of lung function impairment
Occupational exposures to respiratory diseases: A case-based discussion
Related content which might interest you:
Should steroids be used in community-acquired pneumonia? Pro argument
Source: International Congress 2017 – Controversies in community-acquired pneumonia: a pro and con debate
Year: 2017
Should macrolides be given to all patients with community-acquired pneumonia? Con argument
Source: International Congress 2017 – Controversies in community-acquired pneumonia: a pro and con debate
Year: 2017
The need for macrolides in hospitalised community-acquired pneumonia: propensity analysis
Source: Eur Respir J 2007; 30: 525-531
Year: 2007
Duration of antibiotic therapy in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia
Source: Eur Respir J 2010; 36: 128-134
Year: 2010
Are corticosteroids useful in community-acquired pneumonia?
Source: Annual Congress 2006 - Evaluation of risk factors in community-acquired pneumonia
Year: 2006
The approach to antibiotic treatment in community-acquired pneumonia
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - MP14 - The approach to antibiotic treatment in community-acquired pneumonia
Year: 2008
Fluoroquinolone
versus
β-lactam plus macrolide in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Treatment and outcome in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia
Year: 2008
Anti-Pseudomonas antibiotic use for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Lower respiratory tract infections in clinical practice
Year: 2020
Corticosteroids for community-acquired pneumonia: are we still there?
Source: International Congress 2019 – Severe pneumonia: epidemiology, mechanisms and treatment
Year: 2019
Corticosteroids and community-acquired pneumonia
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Corticosteroids and respiratory failure
Year: 2007
Relevance of correct antibiotic choice in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)
Source: Annual Congress 2005 - Community-acquired pneumonia: clinical approaches
Year: 2005
Tigecycline vs levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP): EU experience
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Treatment and outcome in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia
Year: 2008
Antibacterial class is not obviously important in outpatient pneumonia: a meta-analysis
Source: Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 1068-1076
Year: 2008
Impact of macrolide therapy on mortality for patients with severe sepsis due to pneumonia
Source: Eur Respir J 2009; 33: 153-159
Year: 2009
Cost-effective antibiotic management of community acquired pneumonia
Source: ISSN=1025-448x, ISBN=1-904097-32-4, page=198
Year: 2004
The comparison of hospitalized healthcare-associated pneumonia with community-acquired pneumonia patients
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Healthcare-associated pneumonia: ventilator-associated pneumonia and pneumonia in hospitalised patients
Year: 2010
Antibiotic treatment for nosocomial pneumonia
Source: ISSN=1025-448x, ISBN=1-904097-32-4, page=211
Year: 2004
Hospital-acquired pneumonia: microbiological data and potential adequacy of antimicrobial regimens
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: 432-439
Year: 2002
Should steroids be used in community-acquired pneumonia? Con argument
Source: International Congress 2017 – Controversies in community-acquired pneumonia: a pro and con debate
Year: 2017
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of the cookies.
Accept