Asthma cost-effectiveness analyses: Are we using the recommended outcomes in estimating value?

J. van Boven (Groningen, Netherlands)

Source: International Congress 2017 – Primary care management of asthma and self-management of respiratory disease
Session: Primary care management of asthma and self-management of respiratory disease
Session type: Thematic Poster
Number: 3876
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstract

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
J. van Boven (Groningen, Netherlands). Asthma cost-effectiveness analyses: Are we using the recommended outcomes in estimating value?. 3876

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Is treatment with ICS and LABA good value for money for COPD? Multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of the TORCH study
Source: Eur Respir J 2007; 30: Suppl. 51, 194s
Year: 2007

Assessing asthma control using a composite measure based on GINA/NIH guidelines: an analysis of GOAL baseline data
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 47s
Year: 2002

First steps at implementing value based healthcare internationally in sarcoidosis: comparing outcomes.
Source: International Congress 2017 – Respiratory epidemiology: from sarcoidosis to respiratory infections and tuberculosis
Year: 2017


REG endpoint validation: Do database asthma control measures predict future risk?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Management of asthma and other respiratory diseases in primary care
Year: 2014

Is treatment with ICS and LABA cost-effective for COPD? Multinational economic analysis of the TORCH study
Source: Eur Respir J 2010; 35: 532-539
Year: 2010



Primary asthma prevention amongst children — A cost-effectiveness analysis in a decision-analytic framework
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Effectiveness of therapeutic interventions in primary care
Year: 2012


Evidence-based performance indicators of primary care for asthma: A modified RAND appropriateness method
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Innovations in the assessment of airway diseases
Year: 2010

Global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) is an accurate predictor of response to omalizumab in patients with severe allergic asthma: A pooled analysis
Source: International Congress 2014 – Intervening in allergic asthma
Year: 2014


Different definitions in childhood asthma: how dependable is the dependent variable?
Source: Eur Respir J 2010; 36: 48-56
Year: 2010



Disease awareness in COPD: Analyses of clinical parameters and patient-reported outcome from the SAT study
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Inhaler devices in COPD: technical advances, adherence studies and more
Year: 2020


A new observer independent method to assess therapy response in children with severe asthma based on daily lung function
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Uncontrolled and severe asthma in children
Year: 2013


Added value of electronic monitoring in the assessment of asthma control?
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Monitoring symptoms and quality of life
Year: 2013


Development of a decision tree based on real life primary care data: Can we predict the diagnoses asthma, COPD and asthma/COPD overlap syndrome based on automatic data analysis?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Diagnosing and managing asthma and COPD in primary care
Year: 2014


Decision analytic models in COPD/asthma: A critical review of current evidence
Source: International Congress 2016 – How the increasing complexity of chronic care management challenges ethics and costs in our healthcare system
Year: 2016


Estimating exacerbation rates from routine UK primary care data: an exploratory validation from the IMP2ART programme.
Source: International Congress 2017 – Primary care management of asthma and COPD
Year: 2017

Costs of tuberculosis disease in the European Union: a systematic analysis and cost calculation
Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 554-565
Year: 2013



Asthma severity, poor control, co-morbidities and prior resource use determined omalizumab prescriptions in a nested case-control study with US claims data
Source: International Congress 2015 – Clincal aspects of asthma: monitoring and mechanisms
Year: 2015


Estimating potential cost savings associated with managing COPD according to GOLD 2017 recommendations in UK primary care: a CPRD study
Source: International Congress 2018 – COPD management
Year: 2018


The GOLD COPD categories are inaccurate in predicting future risk in a UK primary care dataset and the 2014 changes to cut-off values have not helped
Source: International Congress 2014 – Respiratory disease management in primary care
Year: 2014


Assessment of asthma control based on French guidelines criteria. Results from a pharmacy-based study
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 684s
Year: 2006